SEVENTH SEAL LIBRARY

God's Truth Not Smooth Words

Extra Oil: SDA-Vatican Alliance With the Devil

SDA-Vatican Alliance with the Devil; Conference opinion on Sunday; EG White misquoted about Sunday; Readers might want to be sitting down when reading this Oil:
Extra Oil: SDA-Vatican Alliance With the Devil
shared by Remnant Doctrine Keepers 040211
@copyright 2011 Bonita M Quesinberry 032611

Last week we covered the 1993 massacre at The Branch Davidian compound in Waco, Texas, and SDA’s General Conference response to it; which findings resulted in the innocence of both members and leader David Koresh. We offer quotes, accusations and new teachings, both in doctrine and prophecy, coming out of the SDA Conference and its Local Conference churches today, the evidence proving it joined the Vatican and World Church (WC): an alliance with the Devil, as it were.
—— The following are stunning facts that true Sabbatarians never would have expected of the church God raised up in A.D. 1844 specifically for the Philadelphia church era— the age of preaching one more time God’s Truth (the latter rains) that was in obscurity for 1260 years, man’s trial and the sealing of a just people— actions of which Uriah Smith wrote in “Daniel and The Revelation,” E. G. White had visions and wrote of prior to and again in A.D. 1915 and RDK warned anew in 1981 and has continued to this day.
—— RDK humbly thanks Sister Tammy in Florida for her extensive topic research, much of which she attributes to the Remnant of God website. As Tammy asked of us when she submitted her report, we ask of you, “Are you sitting down?” You might not at first sit down, but you will as we delve deeper into Conference blasphemy and what it ultimately will do to those who “came out of her.”

On Topic:
—— In a 2010 video, Bill Hughes of California, a former SDA Conference pastor and teacher, said he was called into the SDA’s General Conference offices in 1992 and offered a better teaching post at one of their academies (grades 1-12) with the bonus of church housing. There was one catch: he could not teach the 3 angels’ messages (Revelation 14:6-12) for the next three (3) years, that is not until after 1995; by then it could be substantially altered. The time limit obviously was to allow SDA time to change the Revelation interpretation, especially of the 3 angels and beast identity and its mark.
—— Hughes refused the restricted post, for the 3 angels’ messages are vital to insight of the events to occur in the last three church eras as well as identifying great Babylon, the great whore and harlot daughters. Hughes said, “Anyone under the age of 60 has never been taught the true interpretation, only those over 60 were taught by SDA  leaders.
—— Examples of Hughes declaration are both BonnieQ and Tammy; at 67, Bonnie had heard the true teaching, at least that part through the early years of the Philadelphia era to include the three angels’; but at 50 Tammy heard the changed versions: the latter of which disagrees with interpretations in “Daniel and The Revelation,” Ellen G White writings and “Bind Up the Testimony, Seal the Law;” the latter including events fulfilled through the remainder of Philadelphia and Laodicea to await Christ coming only in the clouds.
—— Hughes later recounted a story that a female SDA member had told him, purportedly having occurred in 1955: she and a Catholic friend were visiting the SDA’s friend in an SDA hospital. The two went down to the cafeteria for a snack and, while sitting at a table, the Catholic friend saw two men come in and asked, “Who are those men? What are they doing here?”
—— The SDA woman replied, “They are high up officials of the SDA Conference.” The Catholic said they were not SDA, for she knew them as currently Catholic Priests by the names of Le Roy Froom and Roy Allen Anderson of the D.C. Catholic parish. These two were instrumental in writing the book “Questions on Doctrine” published in 1957 by SDA publisher Pacific Press, which cast doubt and confusion in the church. Many Adventists claimed the book was the raping of Adventism.
—— The confusion of teachings, however, began in D.C.’s SDA College in 1940. The university Dean spoke of theology students reporting to him a new professor of theology teaching doubts contrary to SDA beliefs. One day, as the Dean passed the professor’s classroom, he noticed mail in the teacher’s slot. A voice told him to get that mail; to which command he thought, ‘I do not do such a thing.’
—— After being told a second time, the Dean retrieved the mail and found a letter from the D.C. main Catholic parish instructing the professor on what to teach in order to cast doubt and confusion among SDA students. Alas, that confusion resulted in change of both SDA doctrine and prophecy today, the latter even among Independent SDA the interpretation of Revelation prophecies.
—— Getting back to the three angels’ messages, particularly Revelation 14:9 speaking of the mark of the beast: SDA now declares the beast, great whore and harlot daughters are not Papal Rome or Protestants observing Sunday and that the two-horned lamb is not the United States. Further, SDA— including Independents who came out of her— are teaching that the mark of the beast has not yet been administered by judgment, that said mark is applied to all who deny Sunday, classifying them as antichrists, beasts, great whores and harlot daughters.
—— SDA Independents, on the other hand, believe the mark is not applied until Sunday Blue Laws are enforced. Neither entity, however, is correct, the latter being confused as to timelines of the ages of Sardis, Philadelphia and Laodicea and which events were to occur in each era.
—— While the 3 messages describe all that would occur in Philadelphia, each are from a separate perspective and age:
——— 1. The first angel sounded the time for teaching again that which had almost been lost over the previous 1260 years; this angel worked the informative Sardis age thus part of the announcement was to declare the Sardis era closed and the Philadelphia age began;
———2. The second angel worked the Philadelphia era and announces the Sardis finding of great Babylon’s spiritual fall, which Babylon is shown in other Revelation verses as in three parts— Papal, Protestant, Pagan— two thirds of which are represented by the United States, “that great city;” and,
——— 3. The third angel states what the Truth results in as who works the Laodicea age: those in Philadelphia who do not accept God’s Truth receive the mark of the beast on the spot and, implied but identified in other scripture, are those who accepted Truth had received the seal of God in that moment: then in Laodicea this angel describes what will happen to each person with either a mark or seal; death until the second resurrection or life in the first resurrection, respectively.
—— At this point and in the remainder of Chapter 14, the third angel tells of Christ being given the order to harvest then He comes in the clouds to take up His Saints or, in other words, delivering the sentences for each based on God’s judgment in Philadelphia, the sentence determined by the mark or seal each symbolically bears: either death or life. By this we know the third angel is of the Laodicea era, which enlightenment also was to be taught throughout Philadelphia.
—— Scripture says that Jesus comes with man’s rewards: in legal or criminal court terminology, it is to say He delivers during the final court hearing the appropriate sentences based on each person having been found either guilty or innocent, wicked or righteous. Since God informed us that earth has an example of everything in heaven, we look to man’s criminal courts to determine how God’s criminal court functions. First, there is an arraignment hearing to determine if the defendant should be charged; in heaven’s court, that would be all of mankind based on all have sinned or are still sinning.
—— Then, a second hearing is conducted; more specifically called the trial to look at a preponderance of evidence in order to make an informed decision of innocence or guilt. After all evidence is presented, symbolized by cleansing the heavenly sanctuary, a jury is then sequestered to evaluate evidence and decide if the defendants are innocent or guilty, then they come back into court to declare their decision; after which, a third hearing is preset to determine the sentencing of the innocent and guilty: that is, life or death.
—— Man’s spiritual arraignment was conducted during Sardis while God’s Truth was being rediscovered; the resulting 147-year trial was heard and judged throughout Philadelphia and the defendants marked or sealed as each was judged. Today, we await the sentencing hearing to be carried out by Christ; at which event the guilty die a first death, or remain in the grave if already dead, and must wait 1000 years for their execution to be carried out, which is represented by a second death: that of their spirit beings. Simultaneously, the innocent are taken up to the clouds and are blessed to have no part in the second resurrection.

—— We now come to what things the Vatican has ordered Conference SDA and Sunday leaders and pastors to do to and say of all who follow God’s Truth, which includes rather jarring but not unexpected SDA Conference quotes that include SDA’s opinion of Sunday as the Lord’s Day. Now the reader might want to sit down. The following begins with Rome’s Eucharist and comes from the website of http://www.sdaapostacy.org

—— Eucharist, and Ministry, vol 2, p 341-343, 1985. (This is the SDA Conference church’s official response to the ecumenical meeting they were a part of at the Faith and Order Conference of the World Council of Churches in Jan 1982 in Lima, Peru). The Eucharist is also called the “central celebration of the Christian church” (Baptism, Eucharist, and Ministry, vol 2, p 341). (Notice they capitalize the “Eucharist” in the same way Rome does to depict a “living presence” within the bread.)
——— RDK: Note the confirmation of SDA’s membership in both the World Church and its governing body the World Council of Churches. Of interest is the symbol that appears on the World Church and its Council’s documents and letterheads: 3 wavy lines, one above the other and angled upward like a staircase. Until recently, the SDA symbol was a globe with the three angels around it, indicating being the bearer of the 3 angels’ messages. The SDA symbol has been changed to: an open Bible, from which center radiates 3 wavy lines moving outward and at the same angle as the Papal symbol.
—— SDA also states; “On occasion Seventh-day Adventists refer to the Eucharist as a sacrament” (Baptism, Eucharist, and Ministry, vol 2, p 342). The church also stated that SDA’s are “conscious of the sacredness of the celebration of the Eucharist” (Baptism, Eucharist, and Ministry, vol 2, p 342). (Here they use the Catholic term “celebration” when speaking of the Eucharist. The term “celebration” was also used by Rome when they would kill Christians.)

—— About Papal Rome as antichrist, the SDA Conference wrote what had been taught to a specific man:  “…if he was taught that the Pope is the antichrist, I think that would be a misunderstanding. I don’t feel that’s what we as a church believe… [the antichrist] is not a person, not an individual…” (Kenneth Cox, representing the SDA church in a WTGL TV interview, Feb 8, 1993.)
——— RDK: It is true that the antichrist is not a single individual; rather, the antichrist is the head of a religion that is both civil and apostate church, which perfectly describes Papal Rome. Any current Pope is Satan’s chief minister and it is by the Pope’s titles numbering 666 that Papal Rome was identified as the great whore who controls the reigns of civil power: Revelation’s scarlet woman sitting upon the beast. Thus, the antichrist is a successive title given to many men over time for the number of years they served or are serving as Pope. Antichrist means “against Christ,” which also perfectly describes Papal Rome and her leader. Revelation also refers to “antipas,” which means “against papa” or “against the Pope,” antipas applied to all whom God called His martyrs.
—— “Although it is true that there was a period in the life of the Seventh-day Adventist Church when the denomination took a distinctly anti-Roman Catholic viewpoint…that attitude on the church’s part was nothing more than a manifestation of widespread anti-popery among conservative protestant denominations in the early part of this century [1900] and the latter part of the last [1800], and which has now been consigned to the historical trash heap so far as the [SDA] church is concerned.”— Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (US Government) vs Pacific Press Publishing Association (SDA Church), Civ #74-2025 CBR, Reply Brief for Defendants, p 4. “…Our work is not to denounce the Roman Catholic Church.”— Pacific Union Recorder, Feb 18, 1985, p 4.

—— Who is the antichrist according to SDA? According to the Conference, the Antichrist is: “former Christians” (Signs of the Times, Sep 1990, p 25). “a mind-set” (Signs of the Times, Sep 1990, p 26). Those who teach “false doctrine ” (Adventist Review, Oct 27, 1983, p 7). Those who “draw us away from our commitment to Christ” (Signs of the Times, Sep 1990, p 26). Those who “deny that Jesus is the Christ or the Messiah” (Signs of the Times, Sep 1990, p 25). (In other words, even the Devil and all his evil angels cannot be antichrist now… Matthew 8:29, Mark 1:24, Luke 4:34)
—— What does SDA say is the Mark of the Beast? “The Mark of the Beast principle is that man can…do something that will get him to heaven and make him acceptable to God; the Mark of the Beast involves…salvation by works; the Mark of the Beast, which is salvation by works of self-righteousness. The Sabbath…[is] God’s sign of obedience… But we must beware! Anyone whose focus is on the Sabbath…who looks at his Sabbath keeping as the ground of his salvation…is a candidate for the mark of the beast.”—(Adventist Review, September 7, 1989, p 26). “Ellen White…[writing about the Sunday laws] told the people do not go contrary to civil authority.”— Kenneth Cox, representing the SDA church on WTGL TV, Feb. 8, 1993, supposedly quoted White in the interview.
——— RDK: Clearly, the SDA Conference deemed us, Christ’s true church, as the “mark of the beast” because we “obey God’s Commandments, including the 4th Precept Sabbath;” and, we “deem salvation by works of righteousness instead of grace and grace alone;” and, we “believe the Sabbath is God’s sign of obedience;” and, we “look at Sabbath keeping as the foundation of His salvation” thus we are a candidate for the mark of the beast.
——— Note, however, SDA’s contradictions: first, it says we ARE the antichrists; second our principles make TRUE BELIEVERS the mark of the beast; third and almost in the same breath contrarily say we are a CANDIDATE for the mark. Which is it? The Conference has grossly twisted God’s Word, our Biblical beliefs and do not allow for our obedience being from a foundation of love. However, SDA went one step further to support Sunday by providing a purported Ellen White quote that proved to be both partial and inaccurate, taken out of context and misunderstood (see EGW quotes below).
——— The SDA Conference totally disregarded Christ’s instructions to His followers: 1. Do my Father’s Will (God’s Commandments); 2. “I also am Lord of the Sabbath,” meaning Jesus wields the same seal of authority as His Father; 3. Work out your salvation; 4. It takes both faith and works; 5. The Saints are they who obey God’s Commandments and have the faith of Jesus Christ; and 6. They who obey and teach others God’s Law are called great in heaven. There is a seventh article of our beliefs.
——— In another SDA quote not cited herein, the Conference stated that it does not matter how or when one is baptized, to-wit: sprinkling a baby or adult or by total emersion, either are at that time saved. Sprinkling is clearly Catholic and the only form of baptism they use. As for those of us who “came out of her,” we 7. Believe the only acceptable to Christ form of baptism is that of total emersion of either a child of the age to comprehend the basics of salvation or an adult. Jesus set the example when He was baptized in the river by John the Baptist.
——— There are so many more scriptures that support our beliefs and behavior. As for God’s grace, we understand that grace to be Christ’s blood having cleansed us of our “past” sins and then He expected us to work out our salvation: the Biblical word grace means a two-sided effort denoting action by both parties— God and man. As Paul said, “Faith without works is dead, and works without faith is dead. So, you see, it takes both faith and works. I will show you my faith by my works.” How about you the reader?

—— Ellen G. White wrote: “The dignitaries of church and state will unite to bribe, persuade, or compel all classes to honor the Sunday. The lack of divine authority will be supplied by oppressive enactments. Political corruption is destroying love of justice and regard for truth; and even in free America, rulers and legislators, in order to secure public favor, will yield to the popular demand for a law enforcing Sunday observance. Liberty of conscience, which has cost so great a sacrifice, will no longer be respected. In the soon-coming conflict we shall see exemplified the prophet’s words: ‘The dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.” Rev. 12:17. “Great Controversy,” p. 592
—— In a reply to the Australian SDA church, White wrote, “The light given me by the Lord at a time when we were expecting just such a crisis as you seem to be approaching was that when the people were moved by a power from beneath to enforce Sunday observance, Seventh-day Adventists were to show wisdom by refraining from their ordinary work on that day, devoting it to missionary effort.
—— “At one time those in charge of our school at Avondale inquired of me, saying: ‘What shall we do? The officers of the law have been commissioned to arrest those working on Sunday.’ I replied: ‘It will be very easy to avoid that difficulty. Give Sunday to the Lord as a day for doing missionary work. Take the students out to hold meetings in different places, and to do medical missionary work. They will find the people at home and will have a splendid opportunity to present the truth. This way of spending Sunday is always acceptable to the Lord.'” Ellen G. White, Testimonies, vol. 9 pp. 232, 238.
——— RDK: Concerning White’s first quote, it is part of her vision that the church would become divided both in her time and again later. Recently, Sister Tammy reported her dream and RDK found it in agreement with the vision given in A.D. 1981; the latter being more convoluted and more precise in that, unknown to the recipient at the time, the division already had been in the works almost since A.D. 1844 but not employed and which works caused the first split yet said works continued to this day of obvious division, today’s separation warning singularly issued in 1981.
——— It should be apparent that the SDA Conference took White’s latter words out of context. Sunday, the first day of the week, always has been the day of conducting church business. What she suggested the Australian church do on that day clearly is business that might be perceived by officials as obedience to Sunday: missionary and medical work and spreading God’s Truths.
——— At the time, it seemed a solution to the Blue Laws about to result in arresting Australian Adventists; however, it is not a solution for what already has started coming down on us. At no time did White instruct the Australia church to also worship and rest on Sunday, which definitely would have been to urge the observance of a false Sabbath. White was, indeed and in deed, one of God’s prophets and could not have done such a blasphemous act; for as the Holy Spirit cannot lie, neither can God’s prophets lie. It simply is not in their character to do so, just as it was not in Christ’s character.

—— SDA Conference opinion of Sunday Worship: “All busy people yearn for a day of rest. God Himself gave His permission, a command even, for a day to allow the soul and spirit to be refreshed. This is God’s gift to us. He will take care of us physically and spiritually if we follow His plan. Our systems need the replenishment. Sunday is a special day for this worship and refreshment
—— “Thoreau said, if you want to destroy the Christian faith, first take away Sunday. He was right; it’s a holy day, for those who know Jesus Christ as Saviour it cannot be a holiday. For those of you who have gathered around the cross and have been saved and washed clean by His blood, it is a sacrilege to do anything else on that day except to celebrate what God has done.
—— “If we abuse Sunday, we’re going to destroy something beautiful that God has given. No Sunday means no church; no church means no worship; no worship means no religion; no religion means no morality; no morality means no society; no society means no government; no government means anarchy. That s the choice before us.” Confessions of a Nomad: What We Learned in Sinai’s Shadow, page 86 and 120, by Carolyn and William Self, copyrighted by the SDA Ministerial Association and published by the Pacific Press Publishing Association, 1998.
—— While the Sabbath commandment has a distinct practical value, the specific day, in and of itself, doesn’t. Thus…keeping any other day could ‘work’…” A Pause For Peace: What God’s Gift of the Sabbath Can Mean for You, p 114, by Clifford Goldstein, published by the Pacific Press Publishing Association in 1992. “God is glad for us to go to church both days [Saturday and Sunday]. He wants us to worship Him both days… Anybody who takes a whole day out of every week to spend with God will have more of God’s power in his life, and God can do more through him and in him.” Signs of the Times, Mar 1990, p 22-23.
——— RDK: “A day?” God’s Precept says “THE SEVENTH” day, not “a day.” That was followed with “Gave His permission, a command even;” which is a direct Papal quote about it having been given “the honor of choosing the day and it chose Sunday as ‘the MARK of its ecclesiastical authority to command under sin.'” Then, SDA more or less quotes Papal Rome’s edict of A.D. 200 establishing a civil “day of rest and entertainment.” Further, SDA declared Sunday “a holy day.” There is nothing Biblical about that declaration and the fact Jesus rose on that day is irrelevant.
——— “God has given?” No, God never declared sacred the first day of the week. Sunday remains just one of six workdays for both our jobs and church work. God sanctified and made holy the seventh day but no other day of the week was so deemed. The Fourth Statute speaks for itself, and Hebrews c.4 confirms why the seventh day must be observed exclusively. There is not one Biblical word that declares God wanting us to worship Him on both days. The power of Sunday is that of Satan, not God or His Christ.
——— Found implied in all that the Conference said about Saturday and Sunday was the distinct absence of declaring what is God’s seal. It seems apparent they no longer teach that the Fourth Statute IS God’s Seal; yet, God Himself told us it is His seal: “Keep thou the Sabbath holy, for it is a sign between thee and me that I am the Lord thy God.” Sign, seal, mark, token all mean the same thing: synonymous words. If SDA were to teach Saturday, then they would have to admit that Sunday is Satan’s mark. Instead they say, “if you stay with the church, then you will be saved, as noted below.
——— It should be noted that while sign, seal, token, mark are synonymous words, they do have slight variations in meaning. For instance, God’s seal is referred to as either “sign” or “seal,” the first indicating fact, command, and the latter indicating authority, endorsement, approval; whereas, all other Biblical signs are referred to as either “sign” or “token.” A token is a gesture, a partial payment with the remainder to come later, a sign of affection. “Mark” stands alone in the spiritual realm and indicates a boundary or landmark and also denotes value of gold and silver. “Mark” is certainly the appropriate word to indicate Satan’s counterfeit day, in that his boundary is this earth and his greatest weapon against man are its riches in precious metals, gems and so forth.
——— In searching the Bible for God’s actual seal, we first must look to its example on earth: man’s valid seals of authority. Having learned what constitutes such a seal, we then were directed by God’s declaration above to Exodus 20:8-11 and Deuteronomy 5:12-14 to find that the Fourth Precept meets all the criteria needed for a seal of authority to be valid; but, just to be sure, we also looked at other signs and tokens written in His Word.
——— None of those signs came even remotely close to the criteria; each being a promise God has kept through the ages. As for Satan’s mark of Sunday, it meets only one of the necessary criteria; thus, it cannot be designated a valid seal of authority. Perhaps that is why God did not tell us what is Satan’s mark: it has no value or validity; although, He did give us the clues to find the beast beneath the great whore; then, Satan’s minion told us what is his mark.
 
—— Like the Catholic Church, the SDA Church Saves: “Many times pastors have compared the church to an ark of safety, and I believe it is… The church is a place to preserve our lives…” Adventist Review, Aug 7, 1986, p 23.  Like the ark, the church will help save God’s people…” Adventist Review, Aug 9, 1984, p 18. “Christ’s statement is ‘that the gates of hell shall not prevail against’ the church… Let us stay with the ship. The church…is going through and will surely drop anchor on the ‘sea of glass’ because a ‘Divine hand is on the wheel,’ Christ.” Adventist Review, 07-28-83, p 5.
—— “The local (SDA) church becomes the ‘port of entry’ to the kingdom of God.” Adventist Review, Oct 1, 1992, p 23. “Your walk with God has a great deal to do with your desire to come back to church… As you return, seek Him. He has promised that you will find Him… You won’t drop out again as long as you continue to grow in Him.” Adventist Review, Nov 2, 1989, p 27.
—— “There is some relationship between salvation and church membership.” Adventist Review, Aug 9, 1984, p 18. “I appeal to all who are outside the fold [of the SDA church] just now…If you are not here, He [Christ] misses you…The Father owns the house. Return to Him. For every good love story should have a happy ending.” Adventist Review, Nov 2, 1989, p 8. “…When we backslide from the church, we also backslide from God.” Adventist Review, Jun 2, 1988, p 9.
——— RDK: “Port of entry.” What? We thought Christ was the only port of entry to heaven, not a religious entity; which is as bad as praying to Mary or calling a Priest by Holy Father. However, this too is a Papal Rome claim. First and foremost, Christ’s sheep understand that the Biblical word ‘church’ means the people, not the religion or its buildings built of hewn wood in God’s name; therefore, we understand that Jesus is with us when two or more are gathered in His name, not in some religiously named building that promotes disobedience by its doctrine.
——— Backsliding, rather leaving, that religious entity does not mean we have backslide from God or Christ: it means we heard God’s call to “come out of her, my people.” The statement most revealing SDA Conference alliance with Papal Rome thus Satan is “like the Catholic Church, the SDA Church saves.” SDA’s call for us “to come back” sounds all too much like Papal Rome’s TV commercials for its long gone members “to come home.” A religion is not our home, and we will not get home until Jesus takes us home.

Even those who left the SDA Conference Churches, yet are behind prophetically, are now saying that Christ is about to return and everything is moving fast. This is true; so, it is all the more important that we stand vigilant but at all times peaceful. We are not to “self-defend;” we are, rather, to take the insults, beatings, imprisonment, or death in silence. It means we must at all times remember what will be our reward and it comes fast.

Much love & prayers in Christ,
Sister BonnieQ, God’s Handmaiden

Seventh Seal Library

Advertisements

31 March 2011 - Posted by | AKJV, Apostate, Bible, Bible Related Articles, Christ, Christs Return, Church, False Prophets, God, Government Abuse, Great Whore, Harlot Daughters, Heresy, Holy Spirit, Mark, Papal Rome, Passover, Prophecy, Prophets, Protestantism, Protestants, Religion, Remnant, Sabbath, Salvation, Saturday, SDA, Seal, Sign, Spiritual Study, Sunday, Ten Commandments, Theology, Token, Truth, WCC, World | , , ,

4 Comments »

  1. am a student at KISII HIGH SCHOOL, Kenya. I was expelled from school for preaching about the evils of the papal authority.our school is simply a government school which is not sponsored by any denomination.
    recently a system was introduced which requires all students from all denominations to fellowship on sunday. which was an agreement made by the government and catholic and protestant churches over all public schools.
    i remember sister Ellen wrote, GREAT HOPE, PG 333, ‘the word of God teaches us that these scenes are to be repeated as Roman Catholics and Protestants shall unite for the exaltation of sunday…pg 334, “and a movement to enforce sunday observance is fast gaining ground…..pg 338, ” and those who refuse to unite will then be denounced as the enemies of temperence and reform.
    our principal (a roman catholic) found me in class on a sunday during the service, he inquired me to tell him why i was not in the service. I told him the reality about the forthcoming national sunday law. therefore adventist students cannot take part in the service lest they be partakers of her sins (BABYLON – catholic church and her prostitutes- protestants) rev 18:3.
    he told me, “you cannot satay in this school pack your things and go”
    my parents being pagans gave me 5 days, to choose my so called church SDA or apologize to the principal, and if i choose the church then to hurriedly vacuate their home.
    what should i do please

    (facebook get me as, Jei Arry)

    Comment by joshua onsase | 2 April 2013 | Reply

    • Dearest Brother Jei Arry, please forgive the delay in responding to your comment and request for advice. All I can tell you is what I would do: first, I would ask myself if I loved my school more than God — my answer being I love God more means I would not want to return to that school.

      Again, do I love my parents and home more than God — my answer being that I love God more than any human being means I would leave parents and home very quickly.

      I will advise you that SDA should be there to help you, both with schooling and a place to live.

      You indicate that you are in high school but did not tell me your age; but knowing it would not change the questions to yourself or the answers you give yourself: 1) Do I love God more than my school? and 2) Do I love God more than my family and home?

      Those two questions always have been the test of our love for God since Adam and Eve. Two-thirds of the world will tell you “the day does not matter therefore the school does not matter” and “your family and home should be the most important.” They speak for Satan.

      In my delay, I pray that your problems already have been resolved . . . to God’s satisfaction. In the end, and we are in the last few years of this earth, having pleased God is the only thing that will get us into heaven.

      Much love & prayers in Christ,
      BonnieQ

      Comment by bonnieq | 14 October 2013 | Reply

  2. do you realize the SDA church is now worshiping the beast? do you care to know more?

    Comment by jerry | 15 July 2012 | Reply

    • I do believe your statement is verified in this Extra Oil; however, it should be clarified that it is only the SDA Conference churches: their leaders are members of Papal Rome’s World Church, as are the leaders of every nation (since 2002). In fact, many SDA members have left the churches to form their own little groups. SDA says of these that they (and I) are the false prophets, etc.

      Thank you for stopping by and for your accurate statement. Perhaps, you will begin reading other of the Library’s Extra Oils and even Bible treatises, Bible lessons as it were. You might find them most enlightening. 🙂

      Love in Christ, Sister BonQ

      Comment by bonnieq | 8 October 2013 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: