SEVENTH SEAL LIBRARY

God's Truth Not Smooth Words

EARLY Extra Oil: Two Words Confirm Prophecy + critical info

3x Why Camping’s prediction failed; Picasso about artists’ lies; Laodicea era goes on in 2-words, Armageddon & Megiddo; Statue of Liberty, uh, Lucifer the Light Bearer; 2nd WCC Conf Update; Church of Satan;

Extra Oil: Two Words Confirm Prophecy
shared by Remnant Doctrine Keepers 052711
©copyright 2011 Bonita M Quesinberry 052011

 
Why Camping Failed: We are certain that nearly everyone has heard the prediction of Christ’s return on 21 May 2011 by an 80+ year old man in California: Camping. However, he was not the first: the first having given that date several years before Camping. When his date failed, Camping declared on major news that he had made a mathematical mistake, in that the May date was, instead, the great judgment day. Camping amended his claim, saying Jesus will come on 21 October 2011 for His sheep. Since RDK was the first to expand that date: we feel he had read ours sometime during the last two years then adjusted it to include a specific day.
—— On three counts, Camping was wrong with both dates he has provided: 1. He gave a specific day; 2. Christ would not labor at harvest on God’s Sabbath day, He even remained in the grave on Sabbath; and, 3. The great judgment began in 1844 and ended in 1991. Obviously, Camping and others did not read Jesus’ own words in their entirety: “But of THAT day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, (neither the Son), but my (the) Father only.” (Matt. 24:36, Mark 13:32) The Bible for the season and the year by the Holy Spirit should translate “THAT” as “That specific day and hour,” therefore in no way having stated that we cannot know the season and year.
—— Not only Camping, but also the world, obviously missed the remainder of what Christ said about His return: “And as it was in the days of Noah, so shall it be also in the days of the Son of man. They did eat, they drank, they married wives, they were given in marriage, UNTIL the day that Noah (and his family) entered the ark, and the flood came, and destroyed them all. (So shall also the coming of the Son of man be.)” (Luke 17:26-27, Matt. 24:37)
—— Therefore by three witnesses, it is clear that the only thing we cannot know about Christ’s return is the specific day and hour of the season and year of His coming in the clouds. Jesus was not speaking prophecy; He was speaking a fact, thus what He said is to be understood as literal: not a parable or metaphor as used in prophecy, the purpose to fulfill the fact that the interpretations were sealed with seven seals, meaning they would be interpreted by the events occurring in each of seven ages.
—— RDK is equally sure Christ’s Remnant recall that, since 2009, we repeatedly have given the season and year of our Lord’s return; the Holy Spirit having given us a two-year advance notice, as he had done for Daniel concerning the end of his people’s captivity: “No later than mid-Oct to mid-Nov 2011. We also have advised that even we, and certainly not the world, cannot know the specific day and hour UNTIL the day and hour Jesus comes. Even Christ cannot know the day and hour UNTIL God gives Him the order to begin the harvest and, as did the flood, the harvest begins in THAT moment. Thereof, He will have fulfilled “I come as a thief in the night” to the evil and wicked.
—— Humanity is so desperate to know the day and hour that they even will fabricate the day, thinking that in knowing they will not be destroyed. Notice that even they do not provide a specific hour; perhaps thinking that, in not giving a time, they are more apt to be believed. Then, when their day and hour does not come to fruition, they claim a mistake and justify it by referring to A.D. 1844 when so many with God’s Truth thought He was coming then. Indeed, they did make a mistake but it was prophesied: the mistake’s purpose was to keep the blind and deaf blind and deaf. How better to do that than to make it appear the Saints had lied? Certainly Jesus was not coming then, but by going back to the scriptures they learned the date signaled the beginning of man’s judgment trial, the Truth now out of the wilderness to be preached one more time to give all mankind one more chance to repent, and the sealing of a “just people.”
—— The erroneous specific dates given in this day were not and are not prophesied: meaning God had sound reasons for allowing the mistakes of 1844 but made no provision for the mistakes of today because they would come by man rather than the Holy Ghost. There would be time left for man after Noah’s day; man has no time left today. The flood destroyed but did not cleanse; literal fire consumes and cleanses: it is the literal fire that is coming, flaring from Christ’s feet as He crosses earth’s skies taking up His sheep. God’s Word is exceedingly clear on this matter, at least to the Remnant but not to the wicked.
—— On the other hand, you have those who are desperate to prove to the world that even the Holy Spirit’s date is wrong: that would be Satan “slaying his own” but hoping to take down with them Christ’s Remnant. Of course, the wicked claim “we” are wrong; thus implying that the Holy Ghost is a liar: unforgivable blasphemy. They condemn selves to “twice dead” by not hearing and heeding our warning given and given again, just as Noah gave warning again and again over the course of 100-years. With respect to the end-of-time message, God has given warning over the course of 167-years; more than enough for man to have heard and heeded. Still, they do not repent; instead they curse God, as He said they would.
—— The final word, dearest brethren: continue to spread the warning and pray that at least some will hear, heed and repent.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Picasso mused, “An artist must discover the way to convince his public of the full truth of his lies.” (submitted by Florida’s Sister Tammy)
—— The famed master painter implied more than he realized, for he spoke volumes in one short sentence. Picasso’s “artist” covers a lot more than just making a piece of art look real enough to be a true person, place or thing. But more, there also are those the criminal courts call “con artists;” and, indeed, they go to great lengths to convince people their scams are real and incredibly lucrative: the greedy see dollar signs fattening up their savings thus cannot wait to get in on the “deal of a lifetime.” The “cons” rake in millions before someone catches on and reports to the police. Alas, by then the scammer already has left the country AND has spent the people’s hard earned money they had invested in nothing, zilch, zero: now they have no future vacations and certainly no retirement.
—— There is one con artist, whom we all know, that is even bigger and worse, a deadly swindler: Satan and his army of fallen angels aka demons. Yeah, Lucifer discovered numerous ways and spent many years duping at least two-thirds of earth’s population into buying his lies laced with just enough of God’s Truth to seem believable to those untutored-by-the-Holy Spirit; enough that the deaf and blind embrace Beelzebub’s malformed Christianity and eagerly attend his vile synagogues with our Father’s name upon the thresholds and Christ hanging above their altars. The Destroyer mocks God and Christ at every turn and laughs behind his followers’ backs as he leads them to slaughter.
—— Speaking of Satan’s con game, let us take a look at two of God’s words— a mere two words— that add volumes of interpretive clarity to chapter 16 of “The Revelation;” one word of which is in Revelation and the other in Joshua, Judges, I – II Kings, and I – II Chronicles. Lately, RDK has taken specific or special words in the AKJV Bible, referred to their Hebrew and/or Greek origins, then researched true meanings by following a trail of Greek and Hebrew derivative words.
—— We are determined to debunk Satan’s interpretation of God’s end-of-days omen. Each time it has been exciting to find those words add to a portent, finding absolute harmony generating greater clarity and gaining more confirmations of God’s interpretation. Even more, however, was hidden therein: how God hides secrets and mysteries in plain sight. So! Here we go again— rejoice and enjoy:

ARMAGEDDON: word used once and only in Revelation 16:12-21
—— Ancient Language Definitions of:
——— Hebrew, ârâah – Armageddon (a primary root, no derivatives) to pluck, pluck +(up), gather +(up);
——— Greek, ‘apµayeδδώv (of Hebrew origin) – a symbolic name or a location;
——— Greek Derivatives: ĕpichĕō – to pour, to pour upon, pour in; from
Xéώ chĕō and ĕpi – cover up (of time, place, order, etc), of direction, towards, upon, about (the times), above, after, against, among, as long as (touching), at, beside, have charge of, (be-, where-) fore, in the time of, because of, on behalf of, throughout, untoward, with;
pĕriĕchō – include, clasp, astonish, contain, after (this manner);
pĕri – of place, cause or time (of occasion), general period, thereabout, above, on behalf of, and his company, completeness (through, finished);
ĕchō – (+/- uses) + positive: possession, accompany, count, enjoy, hold, keep, recover, reign, rest, take for;
negative: diseased, do +(need, fear, tremble, lack, lie of law), sick, uncircumcised, use (people), possessed with, return, use +(of or used for) [implies the wicked and filthy]
——MEGIDDO: an ancient city on the plain of Jezreel, also Megiddon in Zechariah 12:11 (Jerusalem mourning for Jesus, mourning like that for Hadadrimmon in the valley of Megiddon) [see Armageddon, Megiddo] valley of Megiddon, a place in Palestine—
——Definitions of Megiddo:
——— Hebrew: rendezvous
——— Hebrew Derivatives: gâdah – to crowd, assemble selves by troops, gather selves together, self in troops, cut selves;
gûwd – to crowd upon, i.e. attack: invade, overcome

——Sunday defines Armageddon as a war between good and evil by using it as a symbolic name, despite being a real location; for the purposes of prophecy it is a “location” but not for a war called by Satan for his fight against God (evil versus good). Megiddo is a reference word to Armageddon; therefore, Megiddo in the Old Testament provides further direction to the location into which Satan gathers his company that rendezvous there to assemble themselves by troops: ALL of the Middle East.
—— Truth is: Rev. v16 is tied to Luke 21:20-27 wherein Christ said, “When you shall see Jerusalem surrounded by armies, then know that the desolation thereof is near.” (Greek “desolation,” bring to nothing) Jesus ends by saying, “For these will be the days of vengeance [“the dregs of God’s wrath” without mercy], so that ALL things which are written [prophesied] may be fulfilled [finished] . . . Then you will see Christ coming in a cloud with power and great glory.”
—— Above and hereinafter, words in underscored bold print directly correlate with the Hebrew and Greek meanings above. Here is God’s perfect logic between Rev. 16:16 and Luke 21:20-27 by using the ancient languages’ intent and/or appropriate usages: The world’s armies rendezvoused in January 1991 to begin the battle man designated Desert Storm while Saddam Hussein called it “the mother of all wars, Armageddon: the first time ever that UN armies of nearly all nations assembled their troops in the location Christ specified: the Middle East.
—— Desert Storm also was the first time ever that any war was televised 24/7. It has yet to end. Satan made a big production of declaring war against God. Fortunately, it is not that war God will join but it will end precisely and only as Jesus predicted: He is “seen in the clouds gathering up His company.” The utter destruction of Israel is instead the entire world and will occur as the seventh angel, following behind Christ, pours out the seventh plague.
—— Revelation 16:13-21— 13. “I saw three unclean spirits like frogs come out of the mouth of the dragon, and out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth of the false prophet. [Papal, Pagan, Protestant are the three parts of Satan’s armies: v.19]
14. “For they are the spirits of devils, working miracles, which go forth unto the kings of the earth and of the whole world [UN, NATO], to gather them to the battle of that great day of God Almighty. [Desert Storm, 1991, followed by most Middle East states in war]
15. “Behold, I (Jesus) come as a thief. Blessed is he that watcheth, and keepeth his garments, lest he walk naked, and they see his shame. [
16. “And he (Satan) gathered them together into a place called in the Hebrew tongue Armageddon. [We know “he” is not Jesus gathering the armies because v.14 identifies the leader assembling the world’s armies. Jesus is gathering up His sheep while Satan’s goats are astonished then instantly fall dead.]
17. “The seventh angel poured out his vial into the air [affects entire planet]; and there came a great voice out of the temple of heaven, from the throne, saying, ‘It is done.'”

—— Verses 18-21 then describe the plague in that seventh vial and the total destruction it brings. Back when Jesus was on the cross and about to die, He had said, “It is done.” He meant only His part was completed in God’s greater plan, was finished: He had died for the world’s “past sins.”
—— Midway through the Rev. c.16 battle, Jesus arrives in the clouds and is seen taking up His saints while the seventh vial is poured out: it is now that God says, “It is done,” His greater plan finished when Christ claimed His purified church and escorts them to the “safe haven of heaven.” The last of all prophecies are fulfilled. What remains to be seen executed are not prophetic; but, because all prophecies were seen fulfilled, they are guaranteed to occur at a specified time in real time: 1. Our return to earth after 1000 years; 2. Evil is destroyed; 3. Earth and heavens are made new; and, 4. New Jerusalem comes down from heaven as the Capital City of Christ’s kingdom: the entire world.
—— Note that the above passages are written in the exact order of events— the war begins, in the midst of the war Christ comes in the clouds “plucking up” His sheep from east to west while, behind Him, the seventh plague is poured upon “the air,” meaning all of earth, reducing it to nothing, a bottomless pit, an abyss. Earth has come full circle, from nothing to nothing and will not be restored for 1000 years.
—— We also knew by the Bible that Armageddon would not be the war between good and evil: first, because the utter destruction of evil will not occur until after our 1000 years in heaven; and second, because the Old Testament says, “They gather untimely and will not do battle with me.” Why? Because God did not call this battle, Satan did. God said that when He calls the battle, it will be after earth has enjoyed her 1000-year Sabbath rest and it will be fought in the Valley of Jehosaphat, the ancient Valley of Decision: not in the ancient plains of Armageddon near Megiddo, which served as an advance warning that Christ is about to arrive.
—— Armageddon symbolizes all that must be fulfilled as Jesus stated, or finished as it were, that all are finished: As God says when we get to heaven, “It is done;” all of prophecy based on prophetic time codes are done. There is no longer a need for prophetic time; only real time. The only thing left then will be our return, evil reduced to ash, earth and heavens made new, and New Jerusalem set down upon earth.
—— Many assume the great battle will be fought near or at the plains of Armageddon and nearby Megiddo because there were many ancient wars fought in the region in order to rid the land of pagans; thus the lands were intended to be and are declared the Holy Lands. Nay, ensuing battles at and near Armageddon and Megiddo were the first sign that earth had entered its Laodicea age, signifying that Christ’s return would now be quickly. It is the sign revealing Satan’s arrogance and his desperation to defeat God; so desperate that that Devil assembled selves by troops, he himself having called the battle: only to be frustrated by God’s refusal to join Lucifer in the fray. So now, Satan is frantically trying to bring about world peace, thinking it will delay the pending fight to his death.

—— Hopefully, all have learned how the meanings and usages of original ancient words have brought definitive clarity to Desert Storm, aka “Armageddon,” versus the actual battle, aka “that great day of God Almighty:” in this case how clarity was hidden in plain sight in two words. We already had learned that God hid much in plain sight by both placement of key scriptures and subtly weaving statements on one topic throughout the entire Bible. Hide in plain sight: by specific verse placement, words used, and weaving statements. All three methods make it impossible for the blind and deaf to understand: they lack belief, obedience and Holy Spirit teaching. God is the most awesome author in the universe: this writer is humbled and honored when God uses her pen for His mouth.
—— The actual great day of God Almighty is different; it is not a battle to obtain or regain lands, as were those ancient battles noted in the above Old Testament passages— it all belongs to God and Christ anyway: Jesus regained all at the cross. It is not a battle to save God’s people; they already are sealed thus saved. When that great day arrives, it will be to rid the world, once and for all time, of evil: the final cleansing of our planet, as it were. Yet it will be no battle at all: the instant Satan and the wicked enter the debris of old Jerusalem, shortly after our return, fire comes down from heaven and instantly reduces them to ash to nevermore remember. When earth is made new, other scriptures say the saints will walk upon those ashes, the ashes of those who tormented and persecuted them with a flood false doctrines and lies against their person.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Statue of Liberty: presented by the History Channel and historians attempting to get the truth about New York’s Statue of Liberty; whom some say is the symbol of Satan. It was definitely made in France and definitely built by the Masons. France made no bones about it being a symbol of Lucifer; but, according to one historian, it is not Lucifer as we know Lucifer; which is Satan. Lucifer, France claimed, is a Latin name that means “Light Bearer” thus the torch in Liberty’s right hand. They referred to Isaiah 13:13-14 as a possible source for thinking of Lucifer as a light bearer: contrarily, the verses say that Satan will ascend to God’s throne “above the stars.”
—— The U.S. knew that Liberty was called Lucifer and is a symbol of Satan but our nation accepted France’s gift as a sign of this being a nation “where the light of freedom shines.” The true nature of the statue, however, is very appropriate for the U.S.; for the U.S. is Revelation’s second beast seen as a harmless lamb with two dangerous horns that also speaks as the dragon.
—— God tells us there are two kinds of stars, those of the night are dim, “without glory,” and the daystar, the sun, is exceedingly bright with glory. Interestingly, in Job 25:5 it is said of God stars in the night sky, “The stars are not pure in His sight.” It is a certainty that even when Satan appears to be an angel of light, it is an inferior light, not pure in God’s sight because he is not an angel of Truth.
—— The following scriptures come a little closer to Lucifer’s purported light as a “morning star” but not “lightning,” which is far brighter than a night star: stars are inferior light when compared to the moon but even more inferior to the light of our sun, the sun being the most fitting star to describe the light of Christ: even the north star signaling Christ’s birth is the brightest star in the night sky. Satan cannot claim that star.

—— “How you have fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! How you are cut down to the ground, which did weaken the nations!” (Isaiah 14:12)
“Son of the morning” reveals only Lucifer’s lineage: God is his Father, but he was not the “first” son; that would be Michael, “the first chief Prince.” Therefore, Michael is God’s Prince Heir Apparent while Lucifer and Gabriel are Prince Royals; although, Lucifer lost his royal title and royal name when cast out of heaven. “Son of morning” might be why the term “morning star” or “daystar” got applied to Lucifer; despite no scriptures found that literally call Lucifer a morning star or daystar. Christ, on the other hand is called “the bright and morning star,” His sun starlight superior to Satan’s small early morning star, even paler than a night star; exceedingly dim by comparison due to his lack of Truth. Christ’s sheep are known as the “children of the day(light)” or “of the light” or “of the morning.” After all, God is our Father, too.

—— “But you (Israel) have carried the tabernacle of your Moloch and Chiun your images, the star of your god, which you made to yourselves.” (Amos 5:26)
Moloch aka Molech was an Ammonite god; Chiun was an idol Israel worshiped, which false god was either the Greek god Preapus or Ba’al-peor; any false god is actually Satan in yet another disguise, thus Moloch and Chiun are the “stars of Israel’s god” at that time in history. Jesus revealed only two universal masters: we either worship God the Creator OR we worship Lucifer the fallen angel; there is no one in between, not even self. Although, there are many who worship them selves.

—— “Yes, you took up the tabernacle of Moloch, and the star of your god Remphan, statues which you made to worship them: and I will carry you away beyond Babylon.” (Acts 7:43)
Remphan was an idol Israel worshiped, either the Greek god Preapus or Ba’al-peor. “Beyond Babylon” indicates a punishment even worse than Babylon’s at that time.

—— “And Jesus said to them, ‘I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.'” (Luke 10:18)
This is the only verse that remotely brings Satan and lightning together; certainly it does not compare his light to lightning. Considering when lightning is cloud to ground only occasionally, the effects of such a strike can be instantly catastrophic: fires and deaths. That is quite a fitting analogy of Satan being cast out of heaven and bound to earth until his utter destruction: it was as fast as a lightning strike. Since he struck earth, there have been catastrophes in the greed he spreads but more in destruction and death everywhere; for he finally has solicited God’s perfect wrath upon the wicked and our planet.

—— It is more likely that the French misunderstood Lucifer as a light bearer, first because of the name’s Latin interpretation but also based on his best impersonation described in II Corinthians 11:13-15 — “For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ. And no marvel; for Satan changes himself into an angel of light. Therefore, it is no great thing if his ministers also transform themselves into ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works.”
—— The French obviously did not think to look to the ancient Hebrew and Greek languages for the translation of “Lucifer.” Neither did they comprehend that the above passage did not mean literally that Satan and his ministers actually repented, then became as the light of Christ; they only appear or seem to be light: whatever light they cast is dim at best, so dim it casts no shadow because their inferior light is shrouded by the darkness of lies. If they translated the name from Latin, then so does Papal Rome call Satan the “Light Bearer.” The Vatican has his symbols all over its small state and buildings.
—— Let us review the Hebrew and Greek translations; but first, it should be noted that the name Lucifer appears only once in the Old Testament— Isaiah 14:12— and not at all in the New: significant of Satan having lost his royal name. It also was a name applied to the king of Babylon: how apropos. Only the name Satan or Devil is used in the New Testament. However, below we find that even “Lucifer” had negative connotations:

——— Lucifer, Hebrewhêylêl: the morning star; derived from hâlal (in the sense of brightness, a primary root) to be clear ‘of sound’ but usually ‘of color’; to shine, hence to make a show, to boast; thus to be foolish; to rave; to stultify (deaden, cloud, blur, reduce): (make) boast (of self), celebrate (self), commend (self), (deal, make), fool, glory, be (make, feign self) mad (against God), rage, renowned;
——— Satan, Greek— Sâţân: the arch-enemy of good, adversary, withstand (resist him);
Hebrew— Satan: the devil; derivatives: rhuparia, moral dirtiness, filthy; ruparos, dirty, cheap or shabby, morally wicked, vile;
Caldean— Satanas: the accuser, the devil

—— Based on the above definitions, we now understand Lucifer’s light— its meaning of morning star— it is dim color, where the bright light of Christ is clear, without color or shadow to diminish clarity. Also, it definitely is a lesser star in that it is not preceded by “the bright and morning star:” as is Christ’s designation. Lucifer does not, however, translate in any language as “light bearer.” But, “morning star” might lead those misinformed into thinking it denotes a light bearer. That misunderstanding is also why Satan worshipers claim that Lucifer, not Michael, is the true God and that Michael is the evil one. Only Christ is a Light Bearer.
—— Throughout the Bible Lucifer/Satan boasts of himself, celebrates himself in his synagogue rituals (Catholic, the mother’s ceremonies), clouds and reduces God’s Truth in his myriad denominations (daughters), he makes deals with man (at one time, failed to make deals with Jesus) and pretends to be God to the point of raging about himself (Satan) as though he were God. The latter sounds familiar, the very thing Jesuits do as they move about the world— deny the Catholic church and speak ill of its doctrine— that in the end Papal Rome receives the gain and glory: theirs is an end justifying the means.
—— This study also clarifies why Satan was called “Lucifer” only once in the entire Bible: he was never worthy of the name, at least in its purest form, not worthy of even the dim light of a night star. His light being lesser also spoke to his position as a Prince Royal, the greater light speaking to Michael’s position as Prince Heir Apparent. From beginning to end, Lucifer has been called either a serpent or Satan or Devil or by the names of all false gods; his fallen angels quickly renamed Demons. It seems logical that he was called Lucifer at the time of his creation but rapidly failed to live up to the meaning of his birth name. After all, God is his Father, too. This study also reveals just how far Satan will go to destroy earth and all mankind. He is like an obsessive-compulsive psychopath: “If I can’t have you, then no one will.”
—— How many murders have we heard about in the news where the killer had such a sick mentality? Just one more reason God said, “Satan slays his own.” It is obvious that, if Satan cannot gain the world and ascend to God’s throne, he will make every effort to destroy the planet along with everything and everyone on it. He has shown God what he is willing to do with man’s wicked inventions: i.e. atomic and nuclear bombs, weapons of all types. With enough of those bombs exploding simultaneously, it is quite likely they would blow apart the earth. We are so blessed to know and understand that our Father will not let this happen: He will destroy Satan first and do it so quickly that Satan will not have time even to blink once.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

WCC Conference Update: The WCC email subject line indicated peace advocates M. L. King III and Jamaican youth, the latter must have pleased the Pope; but this time, as every other time, the body of the email was blank. There seems to be no rhyme or reason for the blank emails from WCC, other than quite possibly there would have been something in that report that they did not want us to know. Unfortunately and since 2000, we have not been able to access their website unless willing to become a member. We are not willing to join such a blasphemous union.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Church of Satan: Lucifer is so pleased with His synagogue. This actual church-without-walls claims to be different from groups having over the years called themselves “Satan worshipers.” This church, no longer in secret, is bold about what it; thus, being “different” claim is not true per evidence below: gives a basic summary of them and provides the nine sins and eleven rules their members must follow. To join this church, one must submit application along with $200; if paid through Pay Pal, the fee is $208. Anyone “proudly” showing a red business card with the acronym C/S on it is a member.
—— RDK gives hearty thanks to Sister Tammy for, once again in her research for RDK, found the website then sent the link to us after giving a verbal run down on what is the Church of Satan; which we now give to our brethren, that you may recognize members if you have as chance meeting with one. Just look for their red card. Neither RDK or Tammy spent much time at their website. Nevertheless—
—— Slightly off-center of their web homepage is a circle with a pentagram in the middle and in the center of that is a red goat with horns [Biblically, the goat represents Satan and his wicked followers but is the Christian’s scapegoat]. Their symbol being off-center seems appropriate, for their belief is not centered upon, but rather contrary to, God and Christ. Summarized quotes from the website follow:
—— “The adamantine Gates of Hell are hereby thrown open—boldly stride within and learn about the “Feared Religion,” or slink away and sustain your ignorance. The choice is yours—let the games begin!

—— “We were established in 1966 c.e. by Anton Szandor LaVey, who declared it the Year One, Anno Satanas, thus opening the floodgates to a revolution designed to smash the hypocrisy and unreason of organized religions and mystical philosophies of either Right or Left-Hand paths. We stand as a formidable threat to those who would halt progress in the name of spirituality and theism of any sort. We are explorers on the untrodden paths of science, human motivation and mystery—all that is most truly occult. —— “Our primary goal is to clearly disseminate the philosophy created by Anton Szandor LaVey to those who have an interest in understanding the truth regarding our beliefs and practices, and to encourage individuals who embrace Satanism to utilize this perspective as a means for enhancing their lives and for leaving a legacy of creativity that demonstrates to human society the potency of our diabolical perspective.

—— Those who proudly carry our red cards identifying themselves as members have the strength and dedication to implement the tools traditionally associated with Satan: the imagination to confound and confuse, the wisdom to recognize the unseen in our society, the pragmatism of a skeptic, and the passions of a classical Romantic soul.

—— . . . as realists, we acknowledge that Satanism remains a controversial religion and thus our policy [to allow no contact] is an important matter of security for our members.

We thus do not maintain any church structures nor are our Central offices open to visitation by the public. Rituals are by nature private activities held in the homes of members.
—— “The Priesthood: Makes up the Council of Nine.
“High Priest” and “High Priestess” are top administrative titles, and can be held only by Fourth or Fifth Degree members. Those who hold Third through Fifth degrees are all members of the Priesthood of Mendes and individuals with these titles may be called “Reverend.”

Registered Member (no degree)
Active Member—Satanist (First Degree)
Witch/Warlock (Second Degree) [also known as Wiccan and Druids]
Priestess/Priest (Third Degree)
Magistra/Magister (Fourth Degree)
Maga/Magus (Fifth Degree)

—— “The Nine Satanic Sins — by Anton Szandor LaVey ©1987

1. Stupidity—The top of the list for Satanic Sins. The Cardinal Sin of Satanism. It’s too bad that stupidity isn’t painful. Ignorance is one thing, but our society thrives increasingly on stupidity. It depends on people going along with whatever they are told. The media promotes a cultivated stupidity as a posture that is not only acceptable but laudable. Satanists must learn to see through the tricks and cannot afford to be stupid.

2. Pretentiousness—Empty posturing can be most irritating and isn’t applying the cardinal rules of Lesser Magic. On equal footing with stupidity for what keeps the money in circulation these days. Everyone’s made to feel like a big shot, whether they can come up with the goods or not.

3. Solipsism—Can be very dangerous for Satanists. Projecting your reactions, responses and sensibilities onto someone who is probably far less attuned than you are. It is the mistake of expecting people to give you the same consideration, courtesy and respect that you naturally give them. They won’t. Instead, Satanists must strive to apply the dictum of “Do unto others as they do unto you.” It’s work for most of us and requires constant vigilance lest you slip into a comfortable illusion of everyone being like you. As has been said, certain utopias would be ideal in a nation of philosophers, but unfortunately (or perhaps fortunately, from a Machiavellian standpoint) we are far from that point.

4. Self-deceit—It’s in the “Nine Satanic Statements” but deserves to be repeated here. Another cardinal sin. We must not pay homage to any of the sacred cows presented to us, including the roles we are expected to play ourselves. The only time self-deceit should be entered into is when it’s fun, and with awareness. But then, it’s not self-deceit!

5. Herd Conformity—That’s obvious from a Satanic stance. It’s all right to conform to a person’s wishes, if it ultimately benefits you. But only fools follow along with the herd, letting an impersonal entity dictate to you. The key is to choose a master wisely instead of being enslaved by the whims of the many.

6. Lack of Perspective—Again, this one can lead to a lot of pain for a Satanist. You must never lose sight of who and what you are, and what a threat you can be, by your very existence. We are making history right now, every day. Always keep the wider historical and social picture in mind. That is an important key to both Lesser and Greater Magic. See the patterns and fit things together as you want the pieces to fall into place. Do not be swayed by herd constraints—know that you are working on another level entirely from the rest of the world.

7. Forgetfulness of Past Orthodoxies—Be aware that this is one of the keys to brainwashing people into accepting something new and different, when in reality it’s something that was once widely accepted but is now presented in a new package. We are expected to rave about the genius of the creator and forget the original. This makes for a disposable society.

8. Counterproductive Pride—That first word is important. Pride is great up to the point you begin to throw out the baby with the bathwater. The rule of Satanism is: if it works for you, great. When it stops working for you, when you’ve painted yourself into a corner and the only way out is to say, I’m sorry, I made a mistake, I wish we could compromise somehow, then do it.

9. Lack of Aesthetics—This is the physical application of the Balance Factor. Aesthetics is important in Lesser Magic and should be cultivated. It is obvious that no one can collect any money off classical standards of beauty and form most of the time so they are discouraged in a consumer society, but an eye for beauty, for balance, is an essential Satanic tool and must be applied for greatest magical effectiveness. It’s not what’s supposed to be pleasing—it’s what is. Aesthetics is a personal thing, reflective of one’s own nature, but there are universally pleasing and harmonious configurations that should not be denied.
—— The Eleven Satanic Rules of the Earth — by Anton Szandor LaVey ©1967

1. Do not give opinions or advice unless you are asked.

2. Do not tell your troubles to others unless you are sure they want to hear them.

3. When in another’s lair, show him respect or else do not go there.

4. If a guest in your lair annoys you, treat him cruelly and without mercy.

5. Do not make sexual advances unless you are given the mating signal.

6. Do not take that which does not belong to you unless it is a burden to the other person and he cries out to be relieved.

7. Acknowledge the power of magic if you have employed it successfully to obtain your desires. If you deny the power of magic after having called upon it with success, you will lose all you have obtained.

8. Do not complain about anything to which you need not subject yourself.

9. Do not harm little children.

10. Do not kill non-human animals unless you are attacked or for your food.

11. When walking in open territory, bother no one. If someone bothers you, ask him to stop. If he does not stop, destroy him.
—— The basic tenet of the Church of Satan is “to do to others what they do to you”— they may as well say, “Do to others BEFORE they do to you”— if someone offends you or bothers you then “destroy them,” if someone is burdened with a belonging “take it from them,” if a guest annoys you then “treat them cruelly and without mercy.” Just these fit Satan’s desires perfectly, as do all nine of their “sins” (commandments as it were). The one about taking a belonging of another, if it is a burden to them, is akin to saying it is okay to steal; for surely the one burdened is not going to give it up willingly.
—— More importantly, this church as well as the pagan religions of Wiccan and Druid ARE members of the World Church (WC) and sit in its ruling body, the World Council of Churches (WCC). This alone should prove who is Papal Rome and who are her harlot daughters, Pagan and Protestant; for their World Church and WCC are “a house divided” and they shall fall. Any and all are WC and WCC members, together with over 6-million individuals as of the year 2000. The membership numbers must be staggering today.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The end is fast coming and far too many are not prepared. Dear Remnant, be strong to the end, harming no one and fearing no person, have no need to defend Truth, do not debate or argue God’s Word; for those who argue and debate are determined that you accept lies thus die. Know that the worst will last an exceedingly short time, then Jesus will be in the clouds calling our names to take us up and escort us to the safe haven of heaven. Stand strong in the faith of Jesus; He will come quickly. 

Much love and prayers,
Sister BonnieQ, God’s Handmaiden
Seventh Seal Library

24 May 2011 Posted by | Abuse, AKJV, Apostate, Armageddon, Bible, Bible Related Articles, Blasphemy, Christ, Christian, Christs Return, Church, End Times, Escatology, False Prophets, God, Great Whore, Harlot Daughters, Hebrews, Holy Spirit, Jews, Mark, Prayers, Prophecy, Prophets, Remnant, Sabbath, Saturday, Seal, Spiritual, Spiritual Study, Theology, Visions, World | , , , | 8 Comments

Extra Oil: No Parental Rights Soon

WCC Conference Update; Out of the Great Whore’s Mouth is No Parental Rights for the world;

Extra Oil: No Parental Rights Soon
shared by Remnant Doctrine Keepers (RDK) 051311
©copyright 2011 Bonita M Quesinberry 051111


World Council of Churches – News
:
Update from last week’s Sabbath Extra Oil and received one this Sabbath, which will be reproduced in next week’s Oil:
PEACE CONVOCATION OPENS WITH STRONG CALLS FROM GLOBAL VOICES
For immediate release: 19 May 2011
—— The International Ecumenical Peace Convocation (IEPC) formally opened on

Wednesday in Kingston, Jamaica, as theologians, faith leaders and the prime minister of Jamaica welcomed some 1,000 participants from more than 100 countries.
—— Keynote speaker Canon Dr Paul Oestreicher, a globally recognized peace activist, called for churches across all spiritual traditions to strengthen their position on peace, even while recognizing their own history of declaring war in the name of God.
—— “Under the sign of the cross, Christian nations conquered other nations,” he said. “In the crusades, they massacred the children of Islam. That has not been forgotten. We, just like our brothers and sisters in Islam, regard those who die in battle as certain of a place in heaven.”
—— Oestreicher acknowledged that the path to peace is obstructed by political complexities.
—— “At the moment war, once it starts, is held by most of our neighbors to be honorable, probably necessary, and sometimes noble. Language disguises the bloody, cruel reality,” he said.
—— The Rev. Dr Olav Fykse Tveit, general secretary of the World Council of Churches (WCC), moderated the convocation’s opening session, which included an opening prayer service, greetings, and stories of churches seeking peace and reconciliation.
——  “I believe that God has called us here from many parts of the world to carry from your countries your experiences,” he said. “Many of you carry with you the realities of the injustice of violence.”
—— Those from the Caribbean region and Jamaica welcomed IEPC participants, many of whom were visiting Jamaica for the first time. Jamaican Prime Minister Bruce Golding acknowledged his own country’s history of violence and, at the same time, its ingenuity and resilience in coping over the decades.
——  “I genuinely believe that we were all created by the same God,” he said. “The challenge is: how can we transform our discussion into a shared set of values that are universally accepted and sustained.”
—— Theologians began asking the questions that IEPC participants will wrestle with during the next week. Archbishop Metropolitan Hilarion of Volokolamsk, chairman of the department of external church relations of the Russian Orthodox Church, spoke of Christians and others across the globe who are daily exposed to humiliation and threats.
—— “The principle question we have to answer is what we as Christians can do together in the face of growing violence, aggression, exploitation and terror,” he said.
—— The IEPC comes at the end of a Decade to Overcome Violence, an initiative of the WCC that strove to strengthen existing efforts and networks for preventing and overcoming violence, as well as inspire the creation of new ones.
—— The Rev. Dr Margot Kaessmann, a Lutheran theologian and minister in the Evangelical Church of Germany, said that IEPC participants are part of a long and complex journey that only begins this week.
—— “Our economies profit from violence and war that we lament,” she said. “Religion plays a vital role with regard to peace-making and overcoming violence. It is time that religion refuses to be misused by pouring oil into the fire of war and hatred.”
—— The opening plenary was preceded by an opening worship and prayer service filled with song and prayers for peace. The events of the afternoon were closed with a prayer from Jamaican Archbishop Donald Reece of the Roman Catholic Church.
—— Both events were broadcast live around the world through a video stream available through the IEPC website www.overcomingviolence.org (Link: http://www.oikoumene.org/index.php?RDCT=a9a041a49a7e2380ab34 ). The morning
plenary throughout the remainder of the IEPC will also be broadcast live through a video stream from 10:30 am – 12:30 pm local time (GMT – 5 hours).
—— IEPC website (Link: http://www.oikoumene.org/index.php?RDCT=88bb003c0e7e98986641 )
Text of the speeches at the opening plenary (Link:

http://www.oikoumene.org/index.php?RDCT=129223c41f4f7738dc8a )
The IEPC in social media (Link:

http://www.oikoumene.org/index.php?RDCT=ed12143c4674768ed909 )
High resolution photos of the event may be requested free of charge via photos.oikoumene.org (Link:

http://www.oikoumene.org/index.php?RDCT=cef8bee9873612474347 )
—— The World Council of Churches promotes Christian unity in faith, witness and service for a just and peaceful world. An ecumenical fellowship of churches founded in 1948, today the WCC brings together 349 Protestant, Orthodox, Anglican and other churches (Islam, pagan, etc) representing more than 560 million Christians in over 110 countries, and works cooperatively with the Roman Catholic Church. The WCC general secretary is Rev. Dr Olav Fykse Tveit, from the [Lutheran] Church of Norway. Headquarters: Geneva, Switzerland.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

RDK Note
:
Pope John Paul II called to (wanted) our children and young adults: on his deathbed, thousands of young people gathered in the Vatican square. The Pope sent a message to them by the Cardinal caring for him, as reported last year by RDK, “I called and you have come.” The Vatican is behind this and is determined to gain total control of the world’s children. We have advised that the moment our children enter public school instantly they become wards of the State; albeit, we still retained most parental rights. That is about to change according to Parental Rights Org. (PRO). The PRO quote below is verbatim, with exception of noted summarized parts for the sake of brevity, the intent remaining as intended:

Parental Rights, presented by the Parental Rights Organization, will be no rights at all.
—— “The right of parents to bring up and education of their children has been upheld for centuries. Today those rights are coming under assault from federal judges who deny or refuse them. Further danger to the child-parent relationship is international law seeking to undermine parental roles also is coming. Together, these threats converge to a “perfect storm” looming over child-parent relationships. (summary)
—— “In the early 1980s, a landmark parental rights case reached the Washington State Supreme Court; a case involving 13-yo Sheila Marie Sumey, whose parents were alarmed when they found evidence of her partaking in illegal drug doings and increasing sexual acts. They immediately grounded Sheila’s from negative influences. (summary)
—— “When Sheila went to school counselors about her parent’s actions, she was told she could be liberated from her parents due to “conflict between parent and child.” Sheila notified Child Protective Services (CPS) was subsequently removed from her home and placed in foster care. (summary)
—— “Her parents challenged social workers in court.
They lost. Even though the judge found Sheila’s parents had enforced reasonable rules in a proper manner, the State law still gave CPS authority to split the Sumey family and take Sheila away.” (summary) 1
DANGEROUS PRECEDENT: “Parental rights are under U.S. attack with the first threat originating in the federal court system. As this story shows, a growing disregard for parental rights is spreading in our nation’s courts. (summary)
—— “Across the country, judges are beginning to deny the vital role of parents in their children’s lives, instead inserting government into the “parental” role. This dangerous claim is leading to the severance of child-parent relationships in numerous instances—removals causing unnecessary pain to children and parents.
—— “A Washington State 13-year-old boy was removed from his parents after he complained to school counselors that his parents took him to church too often. His school counselors encouraged him to call Child Protective Services, which led to his removal and placement in foster care. It was only after the parents agreed to a judge’s decree of less frequent church attendance that they were able to get their son.” 2  (summary) HANGING BY A THREAD: “Not all judges hold a low view of parental rights. Some, like Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, believe parental rights are “inalienable rights” of Americans detailed in the Declaration of Independence but increasingly they are finding it difficult to rule in favor of parental rights when it is not explicitly included in the language of the Constitution. (summary)
—— “Troxel vs. Granville: the last major parental rights case heard by the Supreme Court, Scalia himself denied parental rights the status of an enforceable constitutional right. Other federal court judges are following in his footsteps, citing a belief that federal courts can protect no right unless explicitly stated in the Constitution. (summary)
—— “
The declining support of parental rights found on federal levels has opened the door to a blatant disregard of parental rights within our nation’s lower courts. Parental rights violations are increasing across the country as courts exchange parental rights for government control of U.S. children. The right of parents to raise and education their children hangs by a thread. (summary)
—— “A West Virginia mother was shocked when a circuit judge and a family court judge ordered her to share custody of her 4-year-old daughter with two of her babysitters. Referring to the sitters as “psychological co-parents,” the justices awarded full custody to them, only permitting the mother to visit her daughter four times a week at McDonalds. Eventually she was granted primary custody but forced to continue to share her daughter with the sitters. When her case finally reached West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals in October 2007, the stressed mother was relieved to be granted full custody of her daughter. (summary)
—— “In their October 25 opinion Supreme Court justices wrote they were “deeply troubled by the disregard” for the mother’s rights. One justice referred her right as a “paramount world right.” Chief Justice Robin Davis summed up the case in a simple question, “Why does a natural parent have to prove fitness when she has never been found unfit?'” 3
 (summary)
THE THREAT FROM INTERNATIONAL LAW
:
“The precarious state of parental rights in our nation is reason for serious concern. With cases like these filling courts, every parent should be concerned about protecting and preserving their rights. But another storm is rapidly forming. International law seeks to empower the government to intrude upon the child-parent relationship is an increasing threat. The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), a seemingly harmless treaty with dangerous implications for U.S. families is nearing possible U.S. ratification. (summary)
—— “If this treaty becomes binding upon our country, the government will have the power to intrude in a child’s life by its definition of “the best interests of the child.” The scenarios that could and are occurring as a result of this perilous notion both manifold and frightening. (summary)
—— “Under UNCRC, instead of due process, government agencies would have the power to override your parental choices at their whim because they determine what is in “the best interest of the child.” In essence, UNCRC applies legal status of abusive parents to all parents. This means the burden of proof falls on parents to prove to the State they are good parents—it should fall on the State to prove their investigation is not without cause.” (summary)

A SHELTER IN THE STORM: “There is only one solution to this imminent storm: a constitutional amendment places current Supreme Court doctrine protecting parental rights into explicit language of the U.S. Constitution. This amendment will shelter the child-parent relationship from the coming storm, ensuring parents have the right to raise and educate their children. (summary)
—— “No government, regardless of good intentions, can replace a parent’s love and nurture in the child’s life. Parents care, not because their children are “wards” for whom they are responsible. Parents are willing to face danger, sacrifice, hardship and heartache to ensure the best for their kids. (summary)
—— “Learn about protecting parental rights through a constitutional amendment, and join the campaign now. We must not wait until it’s too late. Take the time to sign the petition to protect parental rights today.” (summary)

NOTES: “1. In Re: Sumey, 94 Wn. 2d 757, 621 P. 2d 108 (1980)

“2. This was not a reported decision and personal names are withheld in such cases as a matter of course. Our source for this information was Michael Farris, J.D., who advised the parents relative to this case.

“3. In Re: Visitation and Custody of Senturi N.S.V., 221 W.Va. 159, 652 S.E. 2d 490 (2007)

Summary of PROPOSED PARENTAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION:
—— “SECTION 1: “The liberty of parents to direct the upbringing and education of their children is a fundamental right.”
—— SECTION 2: “Neither the United States nor any state shall infringe upon this right without demonstrating that its governmental interest as applied to the person is of the highest order and not otherwise served.” 
—— SECTION 3: “No treaty may be adopted nor shall any source of international law be employed to supersede, modify, interpret, or apply to the rights guaranteed by this article.”
Ten things you need to know about the structure of the CRC: “It is a treaty that creates binding rules of law. It is no mere statement of altruism.1.  Its effect would be binding on U.S. families, courts and policy-makers.2. Children of other nations would not be impacted or helped in any direct way by our ratification.3.
—— “The CRC would automatically override almost all U.S. laws on children and families due the U.S. Constitution’s Supremacy Clause in Article VI.4. CRC has some elements that are self-executing, but others will require employing legislation.  Federal courts would have the power to determine which provisions are self-executing.5.  The courts would have the power to directly enforce provisions that are self-executing.6.  Congress would have the power to directly legislate on all subjects necessary to comply with the treaty. This would constitute the most massive shift of power from states to the federal government in U.S. history.7.  (summary)
—— “A committee of 18 experts from other nations, in Geneva, has authority to issue official interpretations of the treaty entitled to binding weight in U.S. courts and legislatures. This effectively transfers authority for all these policies to this foreign committee.8.  (summary)
—— “Under international law, the treaty overrides our Constitution.9. Reservations, declarations or understandings intended to modify our duty to comply with will be void if determined inconsistent with the object and purpose of the treaty.” 10. (summary)
Ten things you need to know about the substance of the CRC:Children would have the ability to choose their own religion but parents would have life by grounding her the authority to give their children advice about religion.13. The best interest of the child principle would give the government the ability to override every decision made by every parent if a government worker disagreed with the parent’s decision.14. (summary)
—— “A child’s “right to be heard” would allow him/her) to seek governmental review of every parental decision with which a child disagreed.15.  According to existing analysis, it would be illegal for a nation to spend more on national defense than on children’s welfare.16.  Children would acquire a legally enforceable right to leisure.17. (summary)
—— “Christian schools refusing to teach “alternative worldviews” and teach Christianity as the only true religion “fly in the face of article 29” of the treaty.18. Allowing parents to opt their children out of sex education has been held as out of compliance with CRC.19. Children would have the right to reproductive health information and services, including abortions, without parental knowledge or consent.20.  (summary)
—— “Parents would no longer administer reasonable spankings of their children.11. A murderer aged 17 years and 11 months and 29 days at the time of his crime could no longer be sentenced to life in prison.” 12.  (summary)
NOTES: “Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Article 26 “Pacta sunt servanda”:
“Every treaty in force is binding on the parties to it and must be performed by them in good faith.”
—— “United States Constitution, Article VI: “This Constitution, and the Laws of the U.S. made in pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the U.S., shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.” (summary)
—— “UNICEF  “Convention on the Rights of the Child” says: “the Convention is a universally agreed set of non-negotiable standards and obligations.” Vienna Convention Article 26 (supra);
—— “U.S. Supreme Court, Whitney v. Robertson, 124 U.S. 190 (1888): “By the Constitution of the U.S., a treaty and a statute are placed on the same footing, and if the two are inconsistent, the one last in date will control, provided the stipulation of the treaty on the subject is self-executing.” (summary)
—— “Vienna Convention (supra) and Article 2 (g):  “‘party’ means a State which has consented to the treaty and for which the treaty is in force” United States Constitution, Article VI (supra, Note 1) (summary)
—— “Arlene Bowers Andrews, Implementing the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child, 171 (Greenwood Publishing Group 1999): “The Convention is generally regarded as two classes of rights for purposes of self-execution, one class is self-executing and one is not self-executing.” (summary)
—— “U.S. Supreme Court, Medellin v. Texas, 552 U.S. ___ (2008), at 170 L.Ed. 2d 190, 219, “Whether the treaties underlying a judgment are self-executing so judgment is directly enforceable as domestic law in courts is a matter for Court to decide.” (summary)
—— “Inter-Agency Standing Committee Reference Group on Humanitarian Action and Human Rights, Frequently Asked Questions on International Humanitarian, Human Rights, and Refugee Law, (2002: “Human rights law contains provisions obliging states to implement its rules, whether immediately or progressively. States must adopt a variety of legislative, administrative, judicial and other measures that may be necessary to give effect to the rights provided for in various treaties. It includes providing for a remedy before domestic courts for violations of specific rights and ensuring the remedy is effective. The fact a state has federal or devolved system of government does not affect a state’s obligation to implement human rights law.” (summary)
—— “U.S. Supreme Court, Reid v. Covert, 354 U.S. 1 (1957): “To the extent the U.S can validly make treaties, people and the States have delegated their power to the National Government and the Tenth Amendment is no barrier.” (summary)
—— “United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, Articles 43 (amended) and 44. Vienna Convention, Article 27: “ A party may not invoke the provisions of its internal law as justification for failure to perform a treaty.” (summary)
—— “Vienna Convention, Article 19, also Louis Henkin, U.S. Ratification of Human Rights Conventions: The Ghost of Senator Bricker, The American Journal of International Law, Vol 89 No 2, 343-344 (Apr. 1995): “Reservations designed to reject any obligation to rise above existing law and practice are of dubious propriety: if states generally entered such reservations, the convention would be futile. The object and purpose of human rights conventions, it would seem, are to promote respect for human rights by having countries—mutually—assume legal obligations to respect and ensure recognized rights in accordance with international standards. Even friends of the U.S.  have objected that its reservations are incompatible with that object and purpose and are invalid . . . By adhering to human rights conventions subject to these reservations, the U.S., it is charged, pretends international obligations but undertakes nothing.” (summary)
—— “United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, Article 37(a): “No child shall be subjected to torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading conduct or punishment. Neither capital punishment nor life imprisonment without possibility of release shall be imposed for offences committed by persons below eighteen years of age” (summary)
—— “United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child, General Comment No. 8 (2006): The right of a child to protection from corporal punishment and other cruel or degrading forms of punishment (arts. 19; 28, para. 2; and 37, inter alia), CRC/C/GC/8, (2006): “The Committee is issuing this general comment to highlight obligation of all State parties to move quickly to prohibit and eliminate all corporal punishment…. Addressing widespread acceptance or tolerance of corporal punishment of children and eliminating it, in the family, schools and other settings, is … an obligation of State parties under the Convention.” (summary)
—— “United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, Article 37(a), (supra) The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child: A Guide for Children and Young People (April 2008), “You have the right to choose your own religion and beliefs. Your parents should help you think about this.” (summary)
—— “Geraldine Van Bueren, International Rights of the Child, Section B, University of London, 29-30 (2006): “Unlike earlier treaties, Convention on Rights of the Child does not include provision allowing for parents to have their children educated in conformity with their parents’ beliefs. In addition, the child’s right to freedom of expression and the right of parents to initially give direction, and later only guidance, strengthens argument that children are entitled to join in decisions so their education conforms to convictions. The second question is whether a child has right to choose a religion. (summary)
—— “Under Convention on Rights of the Child, parents do have right to provide control to the child. Such parental power, however, is subject to two restraints: First, such control should take into account evolving capacities of the child, as expressly required by the Convention. (summary)
—— “Second, the direction should not be so unyielding that it equals coercion. It can be argued that the right to freedom of religion in Convention on Rights of the Child ought to be read together with article 12 which gives the child right to express his own views in the choice of religion.” (summary)
—— “United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, Article 3(1): “In all actions about children, whether undertaken by public or private social welfare institutions, courts of law, administrative authorities or legislative bodies, the best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration.” (summary)
—— “Geraldine Van Bueren, International Rights of the Child, Section D, University of London, 46 (2006): “Best interests provides decision and policy makers with the authority to substitute their own decisions for either the child’s or the parents’, providing it is based on considerations of the best interests of the child.  Thus, the Convention challenges the concept family life is always in the best interests of children and parents are always capable of deciding what is best for children.” (summary)
—— “United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, Article 12(1): “State parties shall assure to the child who is capable of forming his or her own views the right to express those views freely in all matters affecting the child, the views of the child being given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child.” (summary)
—— “Inter-Agency Standing Committee Reference Group: “Human rights law contains provisions obliging states to implement its rules, whether immediately or progressively. States must adopt a variety of legislative, administrative, judicial and other measures that may be necessary to give effect to the rights provided for in various treaties. It includes providing for a remedy before domestic courts for violations of specific rights and ensuring the remedy is effective.” (summary)
—— “Geraldine Van Bueren, International Rights of the Child, Section D, 137: “State parties are obliged to ‘assure’ children who are capable of forming views the rights to express those views ‘in all matter affecting the child’ and to give those views’ due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child’.  By incorporating a reference to ‘all matters affecting the child’ there is no longer a traditional area of exclusive parental or family decision making.” (summary)
—— “ibid., at 36: “[T]he United Nations Committee on Rights of the Child, criticized Egypt and Indonesia on the proportion of their budget spent on defense, as compared to the proportion spent on children’s social expenditure.”
—— “The Committee also criticized Austria, Australia, Denmark, the United Kingdom, and others failing to spend enough tax dollars on social welfare for children: Paragraph 46, Concluding Observations of the Committee on the Rights of the Child: Austria, Committee on the Rights of the Child, 38th sess., U.N. Doc. CRC/C/15/Add.251 (2005).
—— “Paragraph 17 and 18, Concluding Observations of the Committee on the Rights of the Child: Australia, Committee on the Rights of the Child, 40th sess., U.N. Doc. CRC/C/15/Add.268 (2005).
—— “Paragraphs 18 and 19, Concluding Observations of the Committee on the Rights of the Child: Denmark, Committee on the Rights of the Child, 40th sess., U.N. Doc. CRC/C/DNK/CO/3 (2005).
—— “Paragraph 10, Concluding Observations of the Committee on the Rights of the Child: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Committee on the Rights of the Child, 31st sess., U.N. Doc. CRC/C/15/Add.188(2002).
—— “United Nations Convention on Rights of the Child, Article 31(1): “States Parties recognize right of the child to rest and leisure, to play and recreation appropriate to the child’s age and to participate freely in cultural life and arts.” (summary)
—— “American Bar Association, Center on Children and the Law: Children’s Rights in America: UN Convention on the Rights of the Child Compared with United States Law, p. 182.
—— “Paragraph 52, Concluding Observations of the Committee on the Rights of the Child: Ireland, Committee on Rights of the Child, 43rd sess., U.N. Doc. CRC/C/IRL/CO/2 (2006): “While noting social, personal and health education is in the curricula of secondary schools, the Committee is concerned adolescents have insufficient access to necessary information on reproductive health. The education is optional and parents can exempt their children.” (summary)
—— “Paragraph 14, Concluding Observations of the Committee on the Rights of the Child: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Committee on the Rights of the Child, 8th sess., U.N. Doc. CRC/C/15/Add.34 (1995).
—— “Katie Hatziavramidis, Parental Involvement Laws for Abortion in the U.S. and the U.N’s Conventions on Rights of the Child: Can International Law Secure Right to Choose for Minors?, 16 Tex. J. Women & L. 185, 202-203 (Spring 2007): “The unmistakable trend in the U.S. is to consistently increase anti-choice legislation, particularly with respect to minors. Ratification of the U.N. Convention on Rights of the Child by the U.S. holds a possibility of assisting minors seek abortions without parental Interference.  [*203] The Convention may offer the best hope for securing adolescent reproductive freedoms on a global level. If enough diplomatic pressure were exerted on the U.S. to compel it to ratify the treaty, CRC could provide significant improvements in the outlook for reproductive freedom for minors.” (summary)
—— “Paragraph 3, Concluding Observations of Committee on Rights of the Child: Columbia, Committee on the Rights of the Child, 42nd sess., U.N. Doc. CRC/C/COL/CO/3 (2006): “The Committee notes with appreciation…decisions of the Constitutional Court on…the partial decriminalization of abortion.” (summary)
—— “Para. 55, Concluding Observations of Committee on Rights of the Child: Chile, Committee on Rights of the Child, 44th session, U.N. Document CRC/C/CHL/CO/3 (2007): “The Committee is concerned over the high rate of teenage pregnancies, the criminalization of terminating pregnancies in all circumstances.'” (summary)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The end is fast coming and far too many are not prepared. Dear Remnant, be strong to the end, harming no one and fearing no person, have no need to defend Truth, do not debate or argue God’s Word; for those who argue and debate are determined that you accept lies thus die. Know that the worst will last an exceedingly short time, then Jesus will be in the clouds calling our names to take us up and escort us to the safe haven of heaven. To all parents, do not do as the above laws demand; raise your children as God says, not sparing the rod when your kids rebel against God by violating His Law.

Much love and prayers,
Sister BonnieQ, God’s Handmaiden
Seventh Seal Library

20 May 2011 Posted by | AKJV, Apostate, Bible, Bible Related Articles, Christ, Christian, Christs Return, Church, End Times, Escatology, False Prophets, God, Great Whore, Harlot Daughters, News, Papal Rome, Parenting, Prophecy, Protestantism, Protestants, Remnant, Sabbath, Saturday, Seal, Spiritual Study, Sunday, Token, Truth, WCC, World | , | 4 Comments

Extra Oil: Satan’s Artillery

Satan’ weapons; Healing flesh & mind; Vatican’s WCC Int’l Ecumenical Peace Conference 17 May 2011— what does it mean? COMING NEXT WEEK: No Parental Rights soon;

Extra Oil: Satan’s Artillery
shared by Remnant Doctrine Keepers (RDK) 051411
©copyright 2011 Bonita M Quesinberry 050611

—— There seems to be confusion about Satan’s firepower versus God’s weapons of war. Some believe “Satan controls earth’s elements and the catastrophes they cause resulting in death and destruction; that is, whenever God allows him to use His weapons.” However, RDK begs to differ with such a teaching. Our findings in the Old Testament are that God not only showed us but said the following make up His arsenal, which are all natural elements: snow, hail, floods, earthquakes, volcanoes, hurricanes, tornados, tsunamis, landslides, etc. God uses the arsenal to demonstrate His wrath and for war; the former demonstrated in both the Old Testament and Revelation as well as this Laodicea era.
—— If Satan were allowed to use God’s weapons it would foster confusion: for instance, we would not be able to discern whether we were seeing God’s wrath or Satan’s cruelty. We could not discern the difference between punishment or test or annihilation. We would not be able to determine earth’s end close or far off.
—— At no time has God given Satan use of His weapons, any more than the U.S. would willingly allow its enemy-of-war the use of its armaments— discounting what it sells to ally nations and what is on the black market— and neither is there any statement anywhere in the Bible indicating God had or does allow such use. Proof offered was Job 1:10 and 12:19, neither of which imply that Satan uses the elements against us. Sodom, Gomorrah, and Babylon, as well as the entire world in Revelation, are perfect examples of God’s wrath by His weapons, which are random but will worsen beyond our finite imagination when Christ comes to retrieve His Remnant.
—— People always want someone to blame for all catastrophes that happen to them and/or others, whether it is by man or elements: “God does not do those things!” They prefer to believe God is a God of only Love, which Sunday teaches as one of its lies, despite the fact God declared Himself also a “God of war” and revealed His artillery; He also is a good parent who issues discipline and punishment as needed, and who feels every emotion: anger, joy, laughter, grief, vengeance; the latter of which we are denied.
—— Depression, on the other hand, is a body chemistry-induced mental disorder— which can be permanent or temporary depending on the person, as we learned about the man on the island where Jesus cured him of a legion of demons— thus God does not experience depression or burnout; the latter of which is due to one having endured too much on his or her plate for too long but God will take it away if the person is His: it has been determined that BonnieQ experienced burnout, for depression does not affect memory but burnout does.
—— Those are just two of Satan’s weapons against mankind as well as various diseases and other mental disorders, to name only a few: starvation, injuries, birth defects (God uses to test parents and child), bipolar, paranoia, psychopath, schizophrenia and more. God will allow diseases to remain but only as a thorn in our side, such as Paul experienced during his ministry life.
—— FYI: People also want to believe that, when a loved one dies, their beloved immediately goes to heaven to be with our Lord: another lie from Sunday’s ministers, when consoling a survivor and based on a single scripture, “the spirit returneth from whence it came.” A wealth of verses reveal that our personal spirit sleeps in the grave while, if the person died in Christ and they have the Holy Spirit upon them at the time, it is only the Holy Ghost who returns to heaven at the instant of death: He is no longer needed.
—— There is, however, a second understanding of that verse. First, we are reminded that God did not tell Adam he would instantly die if he ate of the forbidden fruit but, ultimately, he did die. So it is with our personal spirit: we were not told that upon death we instantly would go to heaven, but our spirit will go to heaven later— at the first resurrection. That is the Truth Sunday does not speak, just as the serpent did not speak the Truth of the first death appointed to Adam.
—— Another lie by one verse is that the Holy Spirit is God’s Seal, “whereby the Holy Spirit” (Eph 4:30); despite “whereby,” according to Webster’s Dictionary, means “administered by.” The Greek Dictionary defines it “who,” thus “who seals” a person, that being the Holy Ghost. The meanings are the same. A living entity, corporeal or spiritual, cannot be a Seal of Authority; only an inanimate thing can be a unique Seal, IF it meets all criteria for a seal, mark, token, sign. ~~ end FYI
—— Satan’s weapons are Biblically set out as a variety of illnesses both mental and physical: incurable diseases, insanity, lies, illusions, television, radio, computers and false doctrines by his false prophets (religions) that only appear Christian. He has the power to tempt with earth’s riches. He is armed with drugs and alcohol. On the other hand, Lucifer cannot kill or create a human and cannot forcibly take their soul: he can accept a soul IF the person is willing to give over to Satan his or her absolute devotion in exchange for a healing of whatever malady including financial. He certainly can remove whatever he has put upon a person, but then so can God.
——As God does use Satan’s artillery for chastisement, punishment, identifier, and tests, Satan is NOT allowed use of God’s weapons: confirms God’s promise, “I do not bring these ills upon you but, if you give them to me, I will turn them into blessings.” Satan cannot prevent God in any way or stop God’s weapons, but God can prevent Satan at any time He deems appropriate. It is true that God uses Satan as a rod of correction, chastisement, punishment or to test our faith, patience and to humble or identify; but, those come in forms of sickness, disease, financial loss and the like, which Satan delivers only when commanded by God and God determines the rod’s striking force— “Spare the rod, spoil the child:” which also applies to us as parents.
—— God using Satan: say a tornado strikes an area, some homes and businesses are destroyed and a few or many people die, yet others remain untouched, one being a loss and the other, only a few feet from the touched, is untouched. Those touched are God either saying, “You need to repent”, or if one of His died He is saying, “I am sparing you from the worst terrors to come,” or one of His is merely touched and He says, “This is a test of your faith and devotion to me.” To who loves the Lord but is not healed in the flesh His statement is, “My grace is sufficient for you.” Therefore, “financial, goods and/or emotional losses” are felt by whom God deemed worthy of correction, sparing or to test— in the latter case there are seven (7) reasons, any one or more of which applies to each individual: i.e. Paul was not healed for seven reasons, the same as BonnieQ, see “Are Christians Guaranteed Healing;” applicable to the above).
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

World Council of Churches – News:
—— RDK: Back 2000, after hearing on the news a report of the WCC having held a conference in another country and who attended, our first thought was the World Church of whom we had been looking for according to prophecy. We conducted a web search and found the WCC website which, at the time was fully accessible. We printed out a copy of its Charter but could not find a membership list.
—— We then sent an email suggesting membership but would like to know “who are the members.” They sent the list to us, which included all religions both pagan and denominational as well as leaders of all nations; a copy of which we believe is in our research hard-copy files.
—— Several months ago, the WCC began sending emails to us, stating that an inquiry had been made by “Bonnie Williamson,” her former married name. This was done in order to impede tracking us: forgot about the email address, which has not changed during the ensuing years.
—— We assume the WCC went into their historical email files to find our address; likely to determine “why” BonnieQ had not joined and, today, attempting to determine what she is doing with the information. Their first 3 emails were blank with no link to the subject line title. They must have read the Extra Oil in which we advised that they were now sending blank emails; then Thursday, 05/12, a second email was sent including the name Cardinal Koch and reference to Palestine, but the body was blank. The following is verbatim what was in the first email:

INTERNATIONAL ECUMENICAL PEACE CONVOCATION 17 MAY
For immediate release: 11 May 2011

—— With the voices of speakers including Martin Luther King III and German Lutheran pastor Dr Margot Kässmann, the International Ecumenical Peace Convocation (IEPC) will begin next week. This major ecumenical event organized by the World Council of Churches (WCC) is to take place at the University of the West Indies (Link: http://www.oikoumene.org/index.php?RDCT=2dd6dd11d22126743aeb (UWI) in Kingston, Jamaica.
—— “Glory to God and Peace on Earth” will be the theme of the IEPC which aims at witnessing to the Peace of God as a gift and responsibility of the churches and the world. The convocation runs from 17-25 May.
—— The IEPC is the culmination of the Decade to Overcome Violence (DOV) programme authorized by the WCC at its 1998 Harare Assembly and initiated in 2001. The event will bring some 1,000 participants from around the globe, representing WCC member constituencies, ecumenical and civil society networks working in the area of peace and justice.
—— Hosted by the Jamaican Council of Churches and the Caribbean Council of Churches, the IEPC will be the major ecumenical event prior to the 10th Assembly of the WCC in 2013 in Busan, Korea.
—— “The IEPC comes at a time when the world is experiencing significant political paradigm shifts, and much of this is coming with violence and conflict,” said WCC general secretary Rev. Dr Olav Fykse Tveit. “This event brings the peace movements and church leaders together and offers space and time to explore the role of the church and religion as peacemaker. We will ask one another what it means to follow Christ today and tomorrow.”
—— “But peace is not just about ending conflicts,” Tveit continued. “It is also about seeking justice and building sustainable conditions for peace. We find the need for just peace in the economy, peace among peoples and cultures and peace within communities and with the earth.”

—— A culture of just peace: [implies “ruled by law”]
—— The primary goal of the IEPC is to contribute to the efforts to create a Culture of just peace and to facilitate new networks that will focus on peace in communities and the world.

—— Four thematic foci of the IEPC will be on peace in the community, peace with the earth, peace in the marketplace and peace among the peoples. These themes will be addressed through various components of the convocation – spiritual life, Bible studies, plenary sessions, workshops and seminars.
—— “The IEPC will be an occasion to reaffirm the ecumenical family’s commitment to just peace by way of proclaiming a call to just peace,’’ said Dr Mathews George Chunakara, director of the Commission of the Churches on International Affairs  who is heading the IEPC preparation and planning team of the WCC.
—— “The IEPC will also be an occasion for seeking to assess and strengthen the church’s position on peace, provide new opportunities to establish networking and deepen our collective efforts and joint commitments to processes and avenues that will lead to a culture of just peace in a complex world situation,” Chunakara said.
—— On Sunday 22 May 2011, participants of the IEPC will join in a worldwide event when churches are invited to celebrate  (Link:

http://www.oikoumene.org/index.php?RDCT=6935600bd70acca360a4 ) God’s gift of peace. Those who take part will be together in spirit, song and prayer with the IEPC participants in Jamaica, united in the hope of peace.
—— Speakers at the convocation include King and Kässmann, the WCC general secretary Rev. Dr Olav Fykse Tveit, Rev. Dr Paul Gardner of Jamaica, Ernestina Lopez Bac of Guatemala, Metropolitan Dr Hilarion of Volokolamsk of the Russian Orthodox Church, Canon Paul Oestreicher of New Zealand and a dozen others from churches and religious communities around the world.
—— The daily plenary sessions and discussions will be broadcast live via webstreaming. To watch the sessions, go to the IEPC web page www.overcomingviolence.org (Link:

http://www.oikoumene.org/index.php?RDCT=d037db7764c25ede8e87 ).
—— On Friday 20 May, a peace concert will be held in Emancipation Park, Kingston, featuring a number of Jamaican acts including the Fab Five, one of the top bands in Jamaica.
—— More information on World Sunday for Peace (Link:

http://www.oikoumene.org/index.php?RDCT=b610b4dd37b3efe81341 )
How to participate online (Link:

http://www.oikoumene.org/index.php?RDCT=8662c47d47625d6a61bc )
—— The World Council of Churches promotes Christian unity in faith, witness and service for a just and peaceful world. An ecumenical fellowship of churches founded in 1948, today the WCC brings together 349 Protestant, Orthodox, Anglican and other churches representing more than 560 million Christians in over 110 countries, and works cooperatively with the Roman Catholic Church. The WCC general secretary is Rev. Dr Olav Fykse Tveit, from the [Lutheran] Church of Norway. Headquarters: Geneva, Switzerland.

—— RDK: Contrary to the Pope’s statement that all Christians need to unite, what is not included in that last paragraph is the fact WCC membership also includes all pagan religions, such as Wiccan and Druidism, as well as Buddhism, Islam, and all other false religions in the world. These are on the membership list received in 2000 A.D. We learned in the last year that the SDA General Conference also has been a longstanding member but had required the Vatican to NOT show them as a member: that has changed according to a Vatican finding included in a previous Extra Oil, this being one of the reasons a number of SDA members have left Conference churches.
—— It is the Vatican’s World Church, by way of its ruling body the WCC, who will very soon give the order to eradicate Christ’s Remnant church on the premise that we are “the cause of a lack of unity and peace, that cause having brought about God’s unmitigated wrath upon the planet.” Setting up the world for this direction was in a WCC mandate from the Pope last year directing all denominational leaders to urge their members to “civil disobedience” against the Remnant.
—— Those leaders fear no repercussions from police or the Federal Government since all denominational leaders, by way of President Bush the junior, were made an agency under Homeland Security with all the rights and powers thereof. The WCC premise is that if we do not repent and join them, either directly or indirectly through her daughters, they must annihilate us in order to stop God’s wrath to bring about world peace. It will be interesting to see if WCC sends an email to us regarding such a mandate by the Pope.

The end is fast coming and far too many are not prepared. Dear Remnant, be strong to the end, harming no one, feel no need to defend Truth, do not debate or argue God’s Word; for those who argue and debate are determined that you will accept lies and die. Know that the worst will last an exceedingly short time, then Jesus will be in the clouds calling our names as He takes us up to Him and He will escort us to the safe haven of heaven. To all parents, do not do as these laws demand; raise your children as God says, not sparing the rod when the kids rebel against God.

Much love and prayers,

Sister BonnieQ, God’s Handmaiden
Seventh Seal Library

14 May 2011 Posted by | AKJV, Bible, Bible Related Articles, Christ, Christs Return, Death, Earthquakes, End Times, Escatology, Evil, God, Great Whore, Harlot Daughters, Health, Lord's Day, Nature, Papal Rome, Parenting, Prophecy, Religion, Remnant, Sabbath, Salvation, Seal, Spiritual, Spiritual Study, Theology, Tornados, Truth, Volcanoes, WCC, World | , , , , | 5 Comments

Extra Oil: “Useless” Creation

May 01 Beatification; Member Comment, re: Jesuits, Jason Bourne, David Wilkerson; RDK Response; Angel or Eagle, three woes; Vatican Defends Evolution, declares Creationism useless.

Extra Oil: Useless Creation
shared by Remnant Doctrine Keepers (RDK) 050611
©copyright 2011 Bonita M Quesinberry 050211

 

Pope Beatification: A few weeks ago we reported: Vatican to remove Pope John Paul II from catacomb burial chamber into St. Peter’s Basilica sanctuary. They would conduct a Beatification ceremony followed by three days of viewing for visitors to pray to Pope John. The Vatican’s spokesperson said the event of 01 May 2011 would be televised worldwide on every major network and expected billions of viewers and visitors.
—— Well, May arrived and the ceremony aired— BUT, from 1:00 AM to 4:00 AM only and broadcast just on CNN and one non-news cable channel here in the U.S.; no NBC, CBS, MSNBC, Fox News, HLN News, et cetera. There were no repeats during the next few days or evenings, just vaguely reported during local news broadcasts.
—— So much for all major networks and airing at a reasonable hour for other countries. Sure it would not have been live, as it was during those wee hours; but, it would have been easier to view when not half asleep. The billions of viewers the Vatican expected must have fallen short of its projected numbers, if only due to the early hours.
—— RDK watched the four-hour formality, although it seemed to be conducted more as an Easter mass. Of Pope John, Pope Benedict XVI did say they were hoping for a second miracle by John Paul so his sainthood could be confirmed quickly. Nothing monumental happened and we have heard not one peep since then: no reruns during the day or early evening on any day following Sunday the first of May, nothing at all. Of course, this does not mean something will not happen; or, at least appear to happen. We can say that RDK did not stand alone in stating we felt the Vatican might try to make it appear that John Paul was miraculously raised from the dead. Several remnant groups expressed the same possibility on the Internet’s largest social network Face Book.
—— All in all, the service itself was lackluster in traditional rituals that took place in a sanctuary. Later, the unveiling of a huge portrait of John Paul was displayed on the outer Vatican wall next to the balcony used for traditional Sunday messages and from where Benedict acknowledged the visual rendering, recognized the photographer and reconfirmed that John Paul was the most beloved Pope of all time. Thereafter, he delivered the expected Sunday message to thousands gathered in the courtyard below.
—— Obviously and henceforth it is a waiting game until a dramatic event makes global news; whether it be John Paul responsible for another miracle similar to the French Nun who said she had prayed to him after his death and was healed of Parkinson’s disease, OR John Paul miraculously rises from his coffin, OR something equally dramatic occurs that would draw billions of people to Catholic Churches around the world. If or when it does, we immediately will advise our brethren; albeit, there is nothing of the like mentioned in prophecy. ~~ article end
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Member Comment “Extra Oil: What Is an Heretic”
 When you wrote about the extreme Jesuit Oath— having to kill an heretic by the shedding of his blood else there is no remission of sin for that Jesuit— it reminded me of the movie about the life of Jason Bourne, starring Matt Damon: he was required to shoot to death a man in the office who has a hood over his head, which was to fulfill his CIA assassin training. Isn’t the similarity between CIA training/oath and the Extreme Jesuit Oath noteworthy?
—— It’s almost as though the Bourne movie’s message, that assassinations are okay, is to encourage the same mindset in the Western Christian nations’ populace: as long as “the end justifies the means.” In other words, assassinations and torture are okay if done for God and country. Some movies and weekly TV programs (i.e. Criminal Minds, Law and Order, House, 24, and so forth) are to condition our minds to accept what is now politically correct and/or religiously correct, as well as what are now Western society’s norms: accept fanatical beliefs or previously unacceptable-extreme religious standards.
—— As it has been for decades, script writers for the major network programs have targeted those who discipline their children by spanking, those who teach their children to obey the Sabbath and remain separate from the worldly and follow Bible teachings of parents with strict Christian standards: since the 1960s, deemed fanatics and extremists detached from reality, they have been targeted on such programs. Satan controls the news media, and the scriptwriters of those programs do their best to cast contempt upon true Christianity. The words of a popular hospital program, like Dr. Kildare, MD, slammed Sabbath keepers as being way too strict, or off on a tangent, by the question:  “What would you have me do now, keep the seventh day Sabbath?”

—— As David Wilkerson said in his Vision, there will be persecution by the moral majority: it had already started in the 60’s! In the Vision (1973), David Wilkerson was told by the Lord to reveal what he had been shown in the vision; but, he was inclined to remain silent, or afraid to reveal that vision— which is very similar to what Ellen White revealed about the end times, the last generations just before the second coming of Jesus with his Angels. What I want to emphasize, is the part where he is telling about an earthquake coming to the USA, in a region not known for great earthquakes, but it will be on the extremely high end of the Richter Scale, with much loss of life and destruction of that region, setting off aftershocks up and down the West Coast. An earthquake will precede this quake— in Japan!
—— I believe (and believers had been shown in dreams years ago) that it will happen here in Portland, Oregon: bridges will tumble into the Willamette River, or be damaged, too unsafe to use until repaired or replaced.  Most older, 2+ story homes with basements will not stand up in this quake. I believe the Willamette River will also be affected by either a dam above it destroyed or a tsunami wave coming up the Columbia and Willamette Rivers from the Pacific Ocean and flooding lower Portland (downtown), and demolish everything at waterfront elevation. There will be huge slides triggered by the quake, which will break off the high bluff along Willamette Blvd (above Swan Island industrial area, and homes will tumble into broken up rubble— just as they also slid into Cook Inlet during the Anchorage, Alaska, Earthquake.
—— This earthquake will exceed all natural disasters ever to hit America in destruction and loss of life: even worse than Hurricane Katrina! There will be all day TV coverage of it: David Wilkerson was shown. Keep in mind that David Wilkerson revealed in his Vision that the [Sunday] Protestant Churches would someday unite with the Papacy, just as Ellen White was shown in The Great Controversy, p. 445.
—— So many judgments of God are happening in America just at a time when the Blue Laws are being enforced across the New England States and Mid-West. It is Satan’s timing, for now he can claim, as Ellen White prophesied 130 years ago, that it is the desecration of Sunday causing God to send all these natural calamities upon America.
——When the majority of people are wicked, then God withdraws his loving protection from idolatrous and wicked regions, thus tornadoes, floods, earthquakes, drought, disease, etc., follow. Satan can only do what God has allowed; he eventually will destroy all the towns and cities, along with the people he’s deceived. God will take care of his commandment-keeping people and protect them when fire, flood, earthquake, tornado, plague, war, revolution and anarchy, destroy this Nation.
—— Protestantism is dead, the “truth is fallen in the street,” and “justice standeth afar off”, and “the land is being sold into the hands of the wicked”; which is what happens at the end of the world when Jesus comes for His people.
—— Jesus is coming soon, Jesus is coming soon! That is what David Wilkerson said in the presentation of his 1973 Vision. ~~ Lovingly, Bro. Paul M   [RDK: Amen, dearest brother Paul.]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Angel or Eagle
:
While RDK has, for many years, been aware of various changes made to scriptures in a number of newer and new Bible versions, recently it came to our attention of one such damaging change made in Rev. 8:13. The modifying might seem miniscule or irrelevant to some readers; but, we caution everyone to remember God’s Word instructing us that one lie in the midst of His Truth renders the whole a lie.
—— We begin with Rev. 8:13 as it appears in the Authorized King James (AKJV) Bible, the only version we know translated from the ancient Old and New Testament scrolls and only compared to the Vulgate and its offshoots. AKJV is the only translation by divine inspiration that made it possible to fulfill the prophecy of Rev. 10:7 (Sardis era that removed the seals from the latter of Daniel, all of Revelation prophecies followed by fulfilling Rev. 10:11 Philadelphia age of “teaching again, etc.”). As a result, the AKJV unequivocally guarantees God’s absolute Truth in perfect harmony.
—— (Rev. 8:13) “And I beheld, and heard an angel flying through the midst of heaven, saying with a loud voice, ‘Woe, woe, woe, to the inhabiters [people] of the earth by reason of the other voices of the trumpet of the three angels, which are yet to sound!'”
—— Now, for the same verse in the New International Version (NIV): “As I watched, I heard an eagle that was flying in midair, call out in a loud voice, ‘Woe, woe, woe to the inhabitants of the earth because of the trumpet blasts about to be sounded by the other three angels.'”
—— The New Living Translation (NLT) replaced angel with eagle and replaced three woe with three terror. The New Century Version (NCV) replaced angel with a single eagle and changed three woe to three trouble. Oddly, the examiners of the discrepancies referred to the eagle as disturbed eagles, in the plural likely because they had reviewed three Bible versions thus illogically three eagles; although, we do not understand why they deemed the eagle, or even the angel, disturbed when the AKJV does not say or even imply by Greek connotation that the angel was disturbed. The woes, however, were disturbing. The use of other three angels made the change even more illogical since the first voice had been changed to that of an eagle; grammatically correct would have been an eagle and three angels absent the word other.
—— Revelation was written in Greek; so, we consulted the Greek Dictionary for the Greek angel and eagle taken from the scripture-in-point. The angel definition is angel and its derivative word is defined messenger, to carry forth, bring, take to, etc. Eagle in Greek meant an eagle, the connotation being a bird: it was not derived from any other Greek or Hebrew word. The ancient words lend no understanding of why angel was changed to eagle. We suspect it was Satan’s way to prove that people do not read or study the Bible for self, simply accept whatever spews from their chosen pulpit.
—— The angel, or eagle used in the above three versions inspected, is merely God’s messenger delivering to man a dire prophecy about three events to be carried out by the last three of seven angels bearing woes: the last three woes began in A.D. 538 and continued through A.D. 1798. Each of these three woes consumed the 1260 years prophecy, which years were the church ages of Thyatira, Sardis and Philadelphia. It is good to understand that the various prophecies often overlap time spans.
—— Satan and his angels were cast to earth permanently in B.C. 536 (Rev. 12:4,9), which sheds light on why the world had become exceedingly evil during the short span of 102 years, A.D. 538. In that time Christ’s birth, death and ascension to heaven as well as Papal Rome’s firm establishment and great power had occurred. Widespread evil, even among the Jews, was enough so that God was ready to warn Satan’s great whore of great wealth and dominance in the known world.
—— Not heeding God’s three warnings (woes), He then set up the whore for her spiritual fall by opening Daniel and Revelation for interpretation; which Satan hoped to prevent, knowing that her real identity and that of her daughters would be revealed: giving mankind opportunity to hear and heed God’s Truth. And, so it was by the completion of the three woes at the end of the Sardis era, the year’s end A.D. 1843, that Philadelphia preached Truth one more time in A.D. 1844 and ended at the close A.D. 1990— the 1260-yr prophecy finally fulfilled.
—— All relevant prophecies fulfilled to the letter and timing, earth’s end near:
1. Israel’s 70-yr captivity ended, B.C. 606 –538
2. 81-yrs for final permit to rebuild road, Jerusalem and Temple, B.C. 536 – 445
3. 49-yrs road completed, B.C. 457 to 408
3. 434-yrs rebuild Jerusalem, walls and Temple finished, B.C. 408 to A.D. 26
3. 7-years Jesus-Stephen: above #3’s = Daniel’s 490-yr prophecy ends, A.D. 27 to 34
—— Ephesus era 66-yrs A.D. 31 to 100; Smyrna age 223-yrs A.D.100 to 323; Thyatira
—— 1260-yrs Christ’s remnant in wilderness A.D. 538 to 1798;
4. 3.5-years Revelation’s 2-witnesses/France, omen ends, A.D. 1793 (Jan) to 1797 (Jun)
5. 1260-years ended, Satan’s time to deceive world, A.D. 538 to 1798
6. 1290-years fulfilled, Vatican’s spiritual fall, A.D. 508 to 1798
7. 1335-years completed, A.D. 508 to 1844— Sardis era 46-yrs, interpret prophecies,
—— seek God’s Truth, A.D. 1798 to 1844
8. 1810-yrs for Gentiles, A.D. 34 to 1991— sixth era Philadelphia 147-yrs, latter rains to
—— preach Truth again, seal saints, man’s court trial, clean sanctuary, A.D. 1844 to
—— 1991 ends; Laodicea era 20-yrs, warn lukewarm, teach cold, Christ returns,
—— A.D. 1991 to Christ’s return in the clouds
9. 2300-yr prophecy fulfilled, B.C. 457 to A.D. 1844

In January 1991 the final church age began, Laodicea; thus now we wait for only Christ’s quick return, not in prophetic time but literal time: for all prophecies are fulfilled thus Revelation moved into literal time.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

On Topic: Fox News 09-2008, Associated Press, “Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against “Useless” Creationism”
—— VATICAN CITY: A professor at a Vatican-sponsored university expressed dismay Tuesday that some Christian groups reject the theory of evolution — implicitly criticizing the literal interpretation of the Bible. Further emphasizing the official Catholic stance, a Vatican official restated the Church position that evolution is not incompatible with faith. Both men spoke at a press conference ahead of a March event aimed at fostering dialogue between religion and science, and appraising evolution 150 years after Charles Darwin’s landmark “On the Origin of Species.
—— The forum is being organized by Rome’s prestigious Gregorian Pontifical University, which is highly influential in Vatican circles, and by the University of Notre Dame in the U.S. state of Indiana.
—— Popes going back to the mid-20th century have “recognized the scientific value of the theory of biological evolution,” Gennaro Auletta, who teaches philosophy of science at the Gregorian, told reporters. “Greater understanding and assimilation of such subject matter by clergy and faithful has been hoped for. I would like to point out that unfortunately one cannot say that about the faithful of all Christian confessions, as media reports indicate.” Auletta appeared to be referring to stories about fundamentalist churches that maintain a literal interpretation of the Bible, including the belief that the world was created in six days.
—— Monsignor Gianfranco Ravasi told reporters: “One thing is sure. Evolution is not incompatible with faith. Creationism from a strictly theological view makes sense, but when it is used in scientific fields it becomes useless.” Quoting the late Pope John Paul II, Ravasi said that “evolution can no longer be considered a hypothesis.”
—— Pope Benedict XVI warned last week against fundamentalists’ literal interpretations of the Bible. The pontiff told a gathering of intellectuals and academics in Paris that the structure of the Bible “excludes by its nature everything that today is known as fundamentalism. In effect, the word of God can never simply be equated with the letter of the text.”
—— Benedict, in a book published last year, praised scientific progress, but cautioned that evolution raises philosophical questions that science alone cannot answer. In the book, he stopped short of endorsing what is known as “intelligent design.” Intelligent design proponents believe that living organisms are so complex they must have been created by a higher force, rather than evolving from more primitive forms.
—— Vienna Cardinal Christoph Schoenborn, an influential cardinal considered close to Benedict, has condemned a U.S. federal court decision that barred a Pennsylvania school district from teaching intelligent design in biology class. Schoenborn has said he wants to correct what he says is a widespread misconception that the Catholic Church has given blanket endorsement to Darwin’s theories.

—— It is easy to comprehend Rome’s purpose: disprove the Bible as we know it, destroy all Bibles so people will have to depend on the Vatican’s Vulgate— the great whore’s version of God’s Bible— and the people would have to trust that says what God says. Of course, the Vulgate does not agree with God’s Bible, else there would be no reason for Rome to want all Bibles destroyed. Her excuse for such a blasphemous act? “Only the Church has the authority to teach the Bible and interpret its meanings. The Church is the only way of being assured of getting God’s Truth.” ~ end Associated Press article
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

As I know that God has my best interest at heart, so He has yours. Keep the faith, pray unceasingly in these perilous times, watch the clouds while remaining calm and harming no man; for death has no power over us. If it be that we die before Christ arrives, we will be resurrected to fly to our Father’s home.

Much love and Prayers,
Sister BonnieQ, God’s Handmaiden
Seventh Seal Library

6 May 2011 Posted by | Bible, Christ, Death, God, Government Abuse, Heretics, Nature, News, Papal Rome, Prayer Requests, Prophecy, Sign, Spiritual, Truth, World | , , , | Leave a comment